Donate SIGN UP

Bring our troops home now.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 16:03 Wed 21st Mar 2012 | News
30 Answers
http://www.dailymail....oops-repatriated.html

Pictures that should make our politicians hang their heads in shame.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 30rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Shame and Politicians are incompatible.
It is a difficult decision to contemplate.

If we withdraw our troops now, it makes the sacrifice paid by those 6 men (and all the others) utterly pointless. Staying a little longer to make the situation in Afghanistan more stable would be a more fitting tribute for them all.....but it may cost additional lives in the meantime.
When does a govenment listen to the will of the people?

As far as I know, this has been said for a number of years and the usual drones say it's to make Britain safer. Biggest load of poppycock uttered.
PS Politicans know no shame. They are not human.
Question Author
jackthehat

/// If we withdraw our troops now, it makes the sacrifice paid by those 6 men (and all the others) utterly pointless. ///

Yes that is the sad fact, but it has got to happen sometime.

/// Staying a little longer to make the situation in Afghanistan more stable would be a more fitting tribute for them all.....but it may cost additional lives in the meantime. ///

We have been out there for 11 years and that country is only a little more stabilised than it was at the beginning, so why risk even more lives?

Even if we say we will come out in 2 years or 20 years time, it will still be deemed a retreat.
So you're asking our troops to retreat?

Good job you weren't around to undermine the armed forces 60 years ago!

You'd be pulling them back before they'd got off of the D Daay beaches!
It will be deemed a retreat because it's impossible to call it anything else.

There was never going to be a 'winner' in this 'war' or any 'getting the job done' what ever that was supposed to mean.

The reasons are fudged, the strategy was flawed, the endplan was never considered, and only the deaths remain as eveidence we were ever there.

I'm not sure which is worse, the tragedy or disgust.
Question Author
War in Afghanistan, key facts and figures dated 5 July2010

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8143196.stm
So fewer fatalities in Afghanistan in 9 years than were killed on Britains roads in 1?

Isn't it remarkable how the willingness to absorb casualties has evaporated in 60 years

Wars now are not won they are lost by the unwillingness of the people back home to accept losses

Vietnam was a case in point and Afghanistan is just the same
if you'e not going to send troops to war - where they might get killed - what are you going to do with them? Just have them sitting round in barracks waiting for the day someone tries to invade Britain? The last time was 1940... and the last time before that, I suppose, what, 1779?
It would be shameful to leave too early and not achieve our objective.The 400+ who have died during this campaign would then have died for nothing.
Cameron won't back down and still insists the troops will be in combat during 2014. That's in spite the US have said their fighting forces will tail and run in 2013.
The stupid answers that say to withdraw now would betray our brave men who have already been killed. On a different plain, this is like saying "as I have lost £400 at the races so far I had better keep on betting even if I end up losing another £400-£800 - except it human lives we are "playing" with here. In other words you do not keep throwing good money after bad nor do you do so with brave troops. In this case, politicians are prepared to expend the lives of more brave men to hide the stupid adventure on which they embarked. Don't try throwing historical JUST war figures at critics of this disaster. I am not a pacifist or religious but I can see a disastrous policy here and I debate this only to save allied soldiers and Aghan women and childrens lives.
Everyone wants a withdrawal, the US, the UK and the Afghans themselves want us out. And at the earliest possible moment we will withdraw, but that moment isn't quite yet.

The betting analogy above does not work. Our adventure in Afghanistan is more like an investment. We have spent time and lives getting to a situation where our investment might pay off. We wanted a western friendly government installed instead of a anti western fundamentalist Islamic dictatorship which was there before. The Khazi Government whilst not perfect, is pretty close to what we want. However, it is not quite strong enough to support itself. We need to hold our nerve just a little longer before our investment matures and we can get what we want. There is an element of chance like betting, except we have fought long and hard to get the odds strongly in our favour.

There is no one more opposed to the Afghan war than me, but we need to see it through if the whole thing is not to have been pointless.
Don't get me started. Bring them home NOW!
Cry to your soul........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xuz94ZIPfJk
i'm so sorry, just realized that I'm on the wrong thread!
Gromit - do you really believe that The Taliban are going to say 'OK, Britain and the US have supported and propped up a corrupt government that pretends to be the face of deomcracy, so we'll just slink off into the hills and forget about what we want?

Remember when Russia - who committed millions more troops and a lot more time than us - bailed out? the Taliban walked back in, and they will this time.

As I have said before many times, The Taliban only have to wait for the invaders to go hom - they already are home.
andy-hughes

The difference is that when the Russian left they left behind a weak and unstable Government and by leaving in the way they did, they let the Moudjahid/taliban come out as victors. You want us to repeat that error.

Afghanistan has had democratic elections. And the Taliban may even win seats in the Government. When we do leave, there won't be the same mess as when the Russians left. That is, if we finish the job.
Gromit - I don't us to repeat any error - but we have already done that by invading in the first place.

If you believe that the current government the allies support is in any way 'strong' or likely not to collapse like a house of cards when the military support is withdrawn, then i suggest you are reading and viewing selectively when the medai analysis is forthcoming.

'Finish the job'? What is 'the job', how do you defnine it as being 'finished', and who the hell gave 'the job' to us in the first place?

1 to 20 of 30rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Bring our troops home now.

Answer Question >>