I wonder if we are letting our Pavlovian responses - seriously stoked up by the Mail which has its crusading head on over this - run away with us.
Because of our deeply held and uncomfortable views about sex, it is very easy to run away with the notion that children will be given a seriously distorted view of sexual relations by the adult film indfustry.
But do we underestimate our young people?
There is a multi-billion dollar industry devoted to seriously violent computer games, but we trust our younger generation to be aware of the difference between computer graphics and real life.
Similarly, our UK soaps are an uremitting diet of misery, unpleasantness, ludicrous situations, and an all-pervading atmosphere of claustrophobia as every character explores the permutations of relationships with every other character, as well as trying a go at each and every workplace - in a scenario where the option of simply moving away and staying away never seems to occur to anyone.
Magazines present unrealistic impressions of role models, but society resolutely refuses to buckle under them, being more than able to see these cultural aspects for what they are - fictions with a place in life - but not real life.
If we extend that thinking to pornography - and try to avoid our in-built horror and embarassment, we may find that the upcoming gneration assimilate it in the way that we assimilated adult cinemas and magazines in the 1970's.
Yes it is more widely available than ever before - but so are guns, alcohol, heroin and canabis. So are good sexual health advice, tolerance, inclusion and optimism.
They all get accepted and blended in because that is how society evolves - don't lets get too carried away with the notion of a sexual armageddon - its not happened yet ... nor is it showing any serious signs.
Don't worry - the Mail will swing back to radical Muslims next week - business as usual.