Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Girl Shot By Taliban Signs £2 Million Book Deal
83 Answers
Would it be spiteful of me to say that it would be nice to see some of that ploughed back into the NHS that saved her life and safeguarded her future?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-asi a-21968 034
http://
Answers
No, the answer is (c) - you don’t give them £100 in the first place. You keep it and spend on goods and services for the people who have paid it in (or better still, let them keep it and spend it as they wish on themselves). However, I digress. I thought I’d let the dust settle a little before expanding further on my disappointme nt. That way all the accusations...
20:47 Fri 29th Mar 2013
I'm not begrudging her any treatment whatsoever but as she has benefited greatly from the NHS, (regardless of who pays for it) and she is now being educated here at a rather plush school and her family are now resident in the UK I'm just asking that maybe a small portion of any monies she gains as a result of her misfortune may go towards the health, housing and education costs.
-- answer removed --
Sandy - “... She and her family would all be in danger back in Pakistan...”
There was another girl shot on the same bus that day. Try as I might, I can't find her name anywhere so I have no idea whether she lived or died. I find that odd. Since Malala wasn't the only girl shot on that day, why is her family and her specific circumstances being used to justify permanent residency in the UK?
Surely every schoolgirl who attends a (mainstream) school in the Swat district are in constant danger from the Taliban seeing as they want to violently oppress any non-religious education of the female sex. Apart from the grievous injuries sustained by Malala, she is no different from the thousands of other girls living under the threat of murderous Islamic lunacy yet we are treating her very differently.
There was another girl shot on the same bus that day. Try as I might, I can't find her name anywhere so I have no idea whether she lived or died. I find that odd. Since Malala wasn't the only girl shot on that day, why is her family and her specific circumstances being used to justify permanent residency in the UK?
Surely every schoolgirl who attends a (mainstream) school in the Swat district are in constant danger from the Taliban seeing as they want to violently oppress any non-religious education of the female sex. Apart from the grievous injuries sustained by Malala, she is no different from the thousands of other girls living under the threat of murderous Islamic lunacy yet we are treating her very differently.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.