Donate SIGN UP

The Phillpot Lesson

Avatar Image
yerbamate | 14:16 Thu 04th Apr 2013 | News
40 Answers
The way in which the whole benefit system has been manipulated by this ogre, should be the benchmark for all involved in future legislation on handing out benefits. No-one should be able to claim anything other than basic help, for a limited time. Any form of benefit is not a right, but a helping hand. Bring on reform asap.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 40rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Avatar Image
I agree with the OP. Benefits should not be a lifestyle choice, but there to help in times of genuine need.
08:22 Fri 05th Apr 2013
Nonsense - never measure a system by those who exploit it viciously.
Apparently none of the Philpotts' household went to work. They relied solely on benefits. They were in the top 2% of 'earners' in the UK. After tax, they received £98,000 per year.

Obscene!
sir.prize - his wife and mistress both worked.
Sorry - yes you are right hc4361
the ones who exploit the system are the ones who give those who need help a bad name, don't tar everyone with the same brush.
The family received about £68,000.......the equivalent take-home pay of a person earning £100,000.
Let's assume a man earned £100,000 before tax AND had 11 children.

He would still be entitled to benefits.
What be benefits woud he be entitled to hc?
I would agree that you should not judge the whole of the benefits system by the actions of a few individuals.

There are some specific things I have some problems with though- it seems clear from the Phillpot case that he considered his children a means of generating a significant wedge of cash and associated benefits - housing, tax credits etc.

I would like to see child benefits means tested and maybe capped at say 3 kids or something like that....
How do you work that out hc?
Jeez, I really need to edit before hitting submit!
jackthehat. I was quoting BBC World News broadcast 10 minutes ago. Philpotts received £98,000 benefits.

I'm sure it will be repeated on BBC news
///Child benefit
Philpott: £20.30 a week for eldest son, £13.40 for the other ten. Yearly total: £8,023.60p
Working tax credits
Mairead: Up to £20,560 a year for her six children
Lisa Willis: Up to £17,870 for her five children
Estimated earnings from their cleaning jobs: £14,000
Yearly total: £38,430
Housing benefit
Philpott: £150 a week
Yearly total: £7,800
ESTIMATED GRAND TOTAL: £68,000
This is the approximate take-home pay of someone earning £100,000///

From the DM

Child benefit of around £8k a year, plus childcare tax credits of £210 per week.
Jackthehat, £14k of that total is not benefits. It is the earned income of his wife and mistress.
No child benefit when single earner earns over £60k, are the childcare tax credits in place yet?
and housing and council tax benefit.. ?
I know, hc, I was just providing the figures that have been bandied about to illustrate that they were not in receipt of £98,000 worth of benefits, as had been suggested.
man cheats benefit system... let's abandon the benefits system at once!
That's a very new thing though, Rocky

1 to 20 of 40rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The Phillpot Lesson

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.