ChatterBank2 mins ago
Is This The Stupidest Man On The Planet ?
This moron is making an argument FOR female genital mutilation !
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-afr ica-229 58512
If anybody asked me why I am an atheist, I only have to point them at this clip from the BBC News Website.
http://
If anybody asked me why I am an atheist, I only have to point them at this clip from the BBC News Website.
Answers
@ Octavius - If you are going to berate people for expressing a view on a chatsite, you are going to be berating everyone for evermore. There can be no argument from anyone, atheist or zealous fundamentali st, that this specific practice, raised by Mikey in this thread, derives its authenticity from religious belief - a belief that basically everything is the...
09:49 Tue 25th Jun 2013
On a slightly different tack - I've been thinking about why there hasn't been more public outrage over this. I wonder, is it a case of "Well it's only their children they're doing it to". It's their culture and as long as it doesn't affect our children why should we get involved.
I ask this because if, for example, this country had a massive influx of people whose religious practices and culture demanded that these procedures had to be carried out on dogs or cats then the outcry would be massive.
A silly example I know but you could fill in many scenarios that would have the same effect.
I ask this because if, for example, this country had a massive influx of people whose religious practices and culture demanded that these procedures had to be carried out on dogs or cats then the outcry would be massive.
A silly example I know but you could fill in many scenarios that would have the same effect.
One of the main factors chrisgel is, out of sight out of mind. And lets be fair, its not an easy subject to take on, not only because of religio-socio-cultural elements, but by the very nature of it being young girls bodies.
The other fact is that the numbers reflect 'British' subjects, so these people will take their girls abroad to inflict the horror on them, and unless the child is examined on return, nobody would know, and as per above young girls are either going to be brainwashed, or just unlikely to verbally reveal to anyone what has gone on down below due to personal sensitivity issues.
The other fact is that the numbers reflect 'British' subjects, so these people will take their girls abroad to inflict the horror on them, and unless the child is examined on return, nobody would know, and as per above young girls are either going to be brainwashed, or just unlikely to verbally reveal to anyone what has gone on down below due to personal sensitivity issues.
Chris, //why there hasn't been more public outrage over this. //
Political correctness.
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/polit ics/pol itical- correct ness-re sulting -in-fem ale-cir cumcisi on-bein g-ignor ed-in-u k-say-m ps-8656 224.htm l
You see, just as religion must be beyond criticism, so must its practices.
McMouse, don't be surprised. Such is the depth of the indoctrination that many of these women will defend their husbands' right to beat them. (That's in the religious literature too).
Political correctness.
http://
You see, just as religion must be beyond criticism, so must its practices.
McMouse, don't be surprised. Such is the depth of the indoctrination that many of these women will defend their husbands' right to beat them. (That's in the religious literature too).
I'm a bit surprised McMouse, that you are surprised ! Do you seriously think that these Mothers have any choice in this affair ? It would make their daughters seriously unmarriageable if the mutilation didn't take place. To use a new phrase that I have learned this morning from LazyGun, Patriarchal misogyny rules OK in the world of religious drivel.
Octavius - From my thread on this subject. A post made by Atlanta that I thought was interesting and hope she doesn't mind if I use it.
//In Sweden the airports all have Matrons who are authorised by law to inspect girls who are being brought back into the country from "holidays" in Africa. They can inspect any girl they want, and must report to the authorities any evidence of mutilation. This is publicised widely, so parents know that if they bring a freshly-mutilated girl back into the country they will be discovered and they will face jail
But in this country the authorities are too namby-pamby about "culture" to do anything as robust as actually checking girls.//
//In Sweden the airports all have Matrons who are authorised by law to inspect girls who are being brought back into the country from "holidays" in Africa. They can inspect any girl they want, and must report to the authorities any evidence of mutilation. This is publicised widely, so parents know that if they bring a freshly-mutilated girl back into the country they will be discovered and they will face jail
But in this country the authorities are too namby-pamby about "culture" to do anything as robust as actually checking girls.//
chrisgel, in Sweden since 1982 there have only been 2 convicitons for FGM. This paper provides a perspective on "enforced genital examinations without consent" and its effectiveness.
http:// www.uv. es/cefd /17/Joh nsdotte r.pdf
And a link to the author, with further studies.
http:// mah.aca demia.e du/Sara Johnsdo tter
http://
And a link to the author, with further studies.
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.