ChatterBank10 mins ago
Education Levels Of New Recruit To Armed Forces
// the minimum entry requirement for new recruits [in the armed forces] is "entry level 2", which is the equivalent to the standard expected of a seven- or eight-year-old in literacy and numeracy. //
I found that rather shocking. Do you?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/ed ucation -233466 93
I found that rather shocking. Do you?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.That's clearly something which needs addressing, if the army can make use of them I'm sure they can be useful in other areas. There are scores of completely unskilled jobs or manual jobs, but the crux of it is that the majority of these people should not be so unskilled at the end of 12 tears of education, and we need to address that problem.
"A colleague I spoke to recently thought that Chile was near China and the Falklands were near Gibraltar, but then I expect nothing less from people whose main interests are TOWIE, Real Housewives Of Orange County, tanning salons and Hello! magazine. "
That shocking lack of knowledge isn't confined to people of low intelligence or those who allegedly are obsessed with "popular" culture"
I have a friend who is brilliant at quizzes but is plainly not all that bright. I also work with colleagues who are very intelligent and highly qualified yet struggle with crossword clues such as "City in Yorkshire (5)" (L----)
So "knowing stuff" while useful, and intelligence, also useful of course, are not always the same.
That shocking lack of knowledge isn't confined to people of low intelligence or those who allegedly are obsessed with "popular" culture"
I have a friend who is brilliant at quizzes but is plainly not all that bright. I also work with colleagues who are very intelligent and highly qualified yet struggle with crossword clues such as "City in Yorkshire (5)" (L----)
So "knowing stuff" while useful, and intelligence, also useful of course, are not always the same.
"Well, it depends upon their function in the army.
The main function of a sqaddie is to do what he is told.....not easy in modern times....and that takes little in terms of literacy and numeracy.
Seems fine to me. "
and that boils down to fight , whether in a defensive, offensive or both role.
everything else is just a by product to make/help them do it better.
how "intelligent" do the military want their "cannon fodder" to be, and no thats not a dig or joke, because at the end of the day thats what the majority of the military is made up of.
Intelligent people tend to question , not something the miltary really want in a lot of situations, but as sqad said , just to do as theyre told and follow orders.
Within reason a lack of certain skills suits the military because then they have a a blank canvas to work with and they can mould them to suit with little trouble.
The main function of a sqaddie is to do what he is told.....not easy in modern times....and that takes little in terms of literacy and numeracy.
Seems fine to me. "
and that boils down to fight , whether in a defensive, offensive or both role.
everything else is just a by product to make/help them do it better.
how "intelligent" do the military want their "cannon fodder" to be, and no thats not a dig or joke, because at the end of the day thats what the majority of the military is made up of.
Intelligent people tend to question , not something the miltary really want in a lot of situations, but as sqad said , just to do as theyre told and follow orders.
Within reason a lack of certain skills suits the military because then they have a a blank canvas to work with and they can mould them to suit with little trouble.
So these young boys and girls who are academically challenged but have a second chance in the army....who stand an extremely low chance of getting employment in the private particulalry in current times... what do you expect them to do? Live jobless off the state?
This attitude of smug intellectual supremacy based solely on a few popular TV programmes is quite sickening really.
This attitude of smug intellectual supremacy based solely on a few popular TV programmes is quite sickening really.
Chill Doubt, it was tongue in cheek about myself, but 'most of the population' was a silly thing to say.
Actually I admire the lads and lassies who sign up for the forces and who have difficulty in reaching standards or getting jobs. I just hope they think very hard or take a lot of advice before they do so, so that they really understand what they are taking on board.
Actually I admire the lads and lassies who sign up for the forces and who have difficulty in reaching standards or getting jobs. I just hope they think very hard or take a lot of advice before they do so, so that they really understand what they are taking on board.
//I just hope they think very hard or take a lot of advice before they do so, so that they really understand what they are taking on board. //
As I said, education doesn't equate to common sense. Some might be lacking in academia - but that doesn't mean they're stupid, or incapable of making informed choices.
As I said, education doesn't equate to common sense. Some might be lacking in academia - but that doesn't mean they're stupid, or incapable of making informed choices.
After his last tour of Afghan my husband worked as an army recruiter for a year until it was outsourced to Capita in April 2013. I have just asked him about this and he says some did fail but this was mainly the non-British applicants. This is more about weeding out the non-educated non-native English speaking. Even if they passed if he thought they weren't up to the job they wouldn't make it through to the next stage.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.