Crosswords0 min ago
Education Levels Of New Recruit To Armed Forces
// the minimum entry requirement for new recruits [in the armed forces] is "entry level 2", which is the equivalent to the standard expected of a seven- or eight-year-old in literacy and numeracy. //
I found that rather shocking. Do you?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/ed ucation -233466 93
I found that rather shocking. Do you?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Not really. Its encouraging that they will recruit people who may be academically challenged but could be trained in a craft or skills for life such as engineering and provide access to qualifications such as C&Gs, NVQs etc, Employers on the outside world are not really offering that to many people - let alone those with low academia.
http:// www.arm y.mod.u k/train ing_edu cation/ 24345.a spx
http://
I agree with ToraToraTora.
I'm often amazed at the lack of general knowledge of nurses who bang on about how they've "got a degree" yet have very basic literacy skills.
A colleague I spoke to recently thought that Chile was near China and the Falklands were near Gibraltar, but then I expect nothing less from people whose main interests are TOWIE, Real Housewives Of Orange County, tanning salons and Hello! magazine.
I'm often amazed at the lack of general knowledge of nurses who bang on about how they've "got a degree" yet have very basic literacy skills.
A colleague I spoke to recently thought that Chile was near China and the Falklands were near Gibraltar, but then I expect nothing less from people whose main interests are TOWIE, Real Housewives Of Orange County, tanning salons and Hello! magazine.
This, in my opinion is more worrying, examples of questions asked of police recruits.
http:// www.pol icespec ials.co m/forum /index. php?/to pic/167 37-the- police- initial -recrui tment-t est-pir t/
http://
I actually agree with Chilldoubt, I think the levels of literacy, numeracy and general knowledge amongst people who have degrees ( teachers, nurses etc) is often really quite low, but that's still not a reason to allow barely literate people into the army. I don't think it does either the recruits any favours , their comrades (in particularly) or the public perception of the army in general.
without wishing to demean - somebody who has the ability to concentrate on only one thing at a time, or who might be of the entry level quality the army have said is their minimum, is absolutely perfect as a lookout on the railway.
the safety of their group depends on their timely warning of "there's a train coming", which is safer if they're not likely to be distracted.
the safety of their group depends on their timely warning of "there's a train coming", which is safer if they're not likely to be distracted.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.