ChatterBank5 mins ago
Notting Hill Crimeathon
28 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-londo n-23828 099
You can always rely on the unions eh?
You can always rely on the unions eh?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The turnout for the 2012 mayoral election was 38%. That got Boris Johnson elected with somewhat less of a percentage than the votes for the present strike action.
I've no objection to having 50% as a necessary turnout, PROVIDED it is applied to ALL voting situations! If the strike should be a non-starter, then Johnson and his ilk should be thrown out, too...simple as that.
I've no objection to having 50% as a necessary turnout, PROVIDED it is applied to ALL voting situations! If the strike should be a non-starter, then Johnson and his ilk should be thrown out, too...simple as that.
-- answer removed --
The “Overground” mentioned here , emmie, is a collection of routes, some formerly part of the National Rail network and some former London Underground routes which have now been taken under the control of TfL. They are:
Euston to Watford Junction
Richmond/Clapham Junction to Stratford
Barking to Gospel Oak
West Croydon/Crystal Palace/Clapham Junction/New Cross to Highbury & Islington
There is a nice map here:
http:// www.tfl .gov.uk /assets /downlo ads/lon don-ove rground -networ k-map.p df
As you can see, with the exception of the northern end of the Watford stretch, all are entirely within London Boroughs.
Euston to Watford Junction
Richmond/Clapham Junction to Stratford
Barking to Gospel Oak
West Croydon/Crystal Palace/Clapham Junction/New Cross to Highbury & Islington
There is a nice map here:
http://
As you can see, with the exception of the northern end of the Watford stretch, all are entirely within London Boroughs.
Bob Crowe does a good job for his members and is usually a straight talking bloke. But surely it's disingenuous to compare a strike ballot to a political election.
Someone HAS to run the government and local authorities. Whereas no-one HAS to go on strike.
Political elections,generally, have several candidates so it's probably rare to poll over 50% of the vote.
Surely a strike ballot should be a 2 horse race. Yes/No.
I can only presume the RMT had a 'don't know' option. I've no idea why (a legal requirement, possibly) perhaps someone knows?
Someone HAS to run the government and local authorities. Whereas no-one HAS to go on strike.
Political elections,generally, have several candidates so it's probably rare to poll over 50% of the vote.
Surely a strike ballot should be a 2 horse race. Yes/No.
I can only presume the RMT had a 'don't know' option. I've no idea why (a legal requirement, possibly) perhaps someone knows?
It depends on what you mean by "has to", Swejk. By your apparent definition, we could say, "No one has to complain about poor medical care" or "No parent has to keep his/her children under control" or "No citizen has to speak up against crime in his local area" and a multitude of similar points. Union members DO sometimes have to strike.
If more than six out of ten of London's electorate couldn't be bothered to vote for any mayor, why should the winner's election be valid? I refer to Boris Johnson specifically because he is the one who constantly whines that union votes should be invalid if less than 50% of the union electorate voted.
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander!
If more than six out of ten of London's electorate couldn't be bothered to vote for any mayor, why should the winner's election be valid? I refer to Boris Johnson specifically because he is the one who constantly whines that union votes should be invalid if less than 50% of the union electorate voted.
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander!