Home & Garden4 mins ago
Guesthouse Couple Lose Supreme Court Battle.
238 Answers
http://
Just thought I would enter this on behalf of sp1814, because I think he may be a little shy considering that he has been criticising me for repeating the same stories even though mine were years apart.
Just thought I would enter this on behalf of sp1814, because I think he may be a little shy considering that he has been criticising me for repeating the same stories even though mine were years apart.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I don't know if it would have been a difficult deduction to make. Holding hands, or just two men requesting a double bed rather than two singles?
As an interesting opposite, there was one time I'd booked a hotel room on the outskirts of Paris (we're talking Travelodge equivalent really), and for various reasons the friend I was visiting felt obliged to join me in the room overnight (late, and raining like anything, so she couldn't really go back home so late). We were told, on being handed the key, that the room was two single beds "but you could push them together if you'd prefer?" I guess most people just assume that two people sharing a room together must be planning to sleep together too.
As an interesting opposite, there was one time I'd booked a hotel room on the outskirts of Paris (we're talking Travelodge equivalent really), and for various reasons the friend I was visiting felt obliged to join me in the room overnight (late, and raining like anything, so she couldn't really go back home so late). We were told, on being handed the key, that the room was two single beds "but you could push them together if you'd prefer?" I guess most people just assume that two people sharing a room together must be planning to sleep together too.
andy-hughes
/// dave50 - Christians can smell homoexuality from half-a-mile away - I'm surprised you didn't know that! ///
You have entered some valid and interesting debating points during this thread, and then you devalue all those points by entering this rather sarcastic, bigoted and most offensive anti-Christian post, a remark I would come to expect from some ABers but certainly not from you Andy.
Would you have made the same remark against the Muslim faith?
And please don't excuse yourself by making the excuse that you made it in jest, because it was just not funny.
/// dave50 - Christians can smell homoexuality from half-a-mile away - I'm surprised you didn't know that! ///
You have entered some valid and interesting debating points during this thread, and then you devalue all those points by entering this rather sarcastic, bigoted and most offensive anti-Christian post, a remark I would come to expect from some ABers but certainly not from you Andy.
Would you have made the same remark against the Muslim faith?
And please don't excuse yourself by making the excuse that you made it in jest, because it was just not funny.
AOG - "You have entered some valid and interesting debating points during this thread, and then you devalue all those points by entering this rather sarcastic, bigoted and most offensive anti-Christian post, a remark I would come to expect from some ABers but certainly not from you Andy."
My remark was intended as humourous, but I am the first to concede that intention and receipt are not the same thing, so if I offended you, or indeed anyone else, I do apologise.
On reflection, it was a remark more suited to pub conversation than a debate thread, where humour is often not received as intended.
Again, apologies.
My remark was intended as humourous, but I am the first to concede that intention and receipt are not the same thing, so if I offended you, or indeed anyone else, I do apologise.
On reflection, it was a remark more suited to pub conversation than a debate thread, where humour is often not received as intended.
Again, apologies.
Naomi
// This episode brings to mind a discussion we had here some years ago where, because it was against his beliefs, a Muslim pharmacist refused to serve a customer with a prescription for birth control pills. That was upheld. It seems to me we have to make our minds up. Either the religious have a right to impose their beliefs on other people, or they don’t. //
Good point.
// This episode brings to mind a discussion we had here some years ago where, because it was against his beliefs, a Muslim pharmacist refused to serve a customer with a prescription for birth control pills. That was upheld. It seems to me we have to make our minds up. Either the religious have a right to impose their beliefs on other people, or they don’t. //
Good point.
naomi.// This episode brings to mind a discussion we had here some years ago where, because it was against his beliefs, a Muslim pharmacist refused to serve a customer with a prescription for birth control pills. That was upheld. It seems to me we have to make our minds up. Either the religious have a right to impose their beliefs on other people, or they don’t. //
Excellent point.
WR.
Excellent point.
WR.
Latest Posts
Family & Relationships10 mins ago
Home & Garden15 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles18 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.