Apparently he is worth £11m. Most of that came from the BBC. But they have been silent on the issue. Yet with Savile they couldn't apologise fast enough. Do they still see him as an asset or something?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/bbc-wont-hold-its-own-inquiry-into-rolf-harris/story-e6frg6so-1226976096204?nk=19a89520c6f838c0d69e4a93ce8cc419 I can't see the point in apologising, but I think the BBC should conduct an inquiry. There is also the matter of the missing painting of the Queen, what has happened to that? It is...
They employed him before he had a criminal record. The complaints were made to police under Operation Yew Tree in 2012 and he has since been investigated and convivted.
Not sure what the BBC ate expected to apologise for? Do you think the employer of everyone convicted of a sex crime should apologise for their employee?
With Savile part of the problem for the BBC was the ITV documentary, which wrongfooted them a bit after they'd suppressed a similar programme. And brought a torrent of hand-wringing from them, a lot of it probably unnecessary
I'm surprised to hear most of Rolf Harris's wealth comes from the BBC. He surely must have earned a lot from his paintings.
Sorry inksplotter you are not making sense.. We are talking about someone who's just been convicted by the courts of serious sexual offences. What's that got to do with Clarkson and Brand? There is no comparison.
I don't understand what you want them to do. These crimes were committed years ago. Harris isn't the only one. Where do the BBC and ITV start and stop with apologising for things in the past - when it was a completely different management structure in those days gone by.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.