Keyplus, the bible makes the location of the ‘Promised Land’ very clear, but where do you think it might have been? Egypt? When Mohammed constructed the Quran he based it on the bible – there is no doubt whatsoever about that. However, because his account is vague and inaccurate some Muslim scholars claim that Egypt was the ‘Promised Land’ – but it’s a silly and ill-considered argument really. Would it have been more acceptable in today’s world for Egyptians to be ejected from their land in favour of newly arriving Jews?
//Are you saying that Western countries are acting upon Biblical quotations by giving Jews a place in Palestine and by backing them up for whatever they do there now? Please answer Yes, or no.//
In effect, yes. The Jews’ claim to the land is solely biblical, which realistically means they have no justifiable claim at all. However, they’re there now – that isn’t going to change – so all the arguing about why they’re there isn’t going to bring resolution to the problem we have. They’re not going to abandon the land, and the Palestinians aren’t going to concede defeat – so what’s the sensible answer?
To answer your other question, both the Pharaoh and Moses were in Egypt but neither were in Palestine - and the Bible tells us precisely why Moses wasn't in Palestine. Bit mean of God I always thought - but that's God for you. ;o)