Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 27 of 27rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
sp, I can't speak for AOG, but I'd guess the issue here is one of the identity of wrongdoers being withheld because identifying them might cause distress.

should Ian Watkins' name and misdemeanours have been withheld because disclosure was bound to wreck his human right to a lucrative career?
Question Author
THECORBYLOON

/// I didn't mention those other issues because no-one else had raised them. ///

And I did not raise the ethnicity issue either.
Question Author
sp1814

Just simply asking a reasonable question, are we not allowed to do that, or is it just me, because some seem to carry a certain chip on their shoulders for some reason or other.

You along with others just seem to read something into things that are not there, where does it mention ethnics? but it does mention both Labour and Conservative councillors so there is no one sidedness there.

And it does mention Bolton, but as Gromit pointed out this Council Tax avoidance is also prevalent among some councillors in Bradford.
Does the fact that some Bradford councillors have not paid any council tax have any bearing on this question?
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-28303368 they are a few miles from Bradford and Bolton so they may not count...
Am I the only one who felt a bit perturbed reading 'ethnic', 'Asian' and 'dots' within a couple of posts and wondered where it was going?

21 to 27 of 27rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Why The Secrecy?

Answer Question >>