I'm in the "Yes" camp (although outrageously, living in England, I don't get a vote on the future of my nation).
"Devolution that came about as a result of Labour winning the landslide victory in 1997 I might remind everybody"
Yes quite true, Mikey. And one of the most ridiculous measures to come from a government in recent years, even by that administration's abysmal standards.
The South East (with a population far greater than that of Scotland and Wales combined) has often been governed by a party that most of the electorate there have no intention ever of voting for. It's called democracy - you don't always get what you want. Scotland or Wales have no more right to independence - or for that matter devolution - than the South East, or Cornwall or Liverpool has. When this nonsensical referendum is done and dusted and the Nos have it as I'm sure they will, the UK government should set about homogenising the minor nations in to the rest of the UK. That includes their financial systems, their judicial systems and everything else that is the responsibility of the UK government in England. Either that or break up the whole kit and caboodle into four bits and let each of them get on with it.
I hope I'm not too arrogant because actually I don't give a monkey's how the vote goes. If it results in Scottish independence that's fine so long as it is achieved quickly and does not compromise the UK's currency by involving a Sterling currency union with an independent nation that has not a hope in hell of paying its way. If it results in a "No" vote that too is no big deal, but any more devolutionary measures (the so-called "dev-max" solution) would be a grave mistake.