Those who cry 'unduly lenient' are perhaps looking at this too narrow. DLT has a conviction against his name, has suffered the long anguish of two trials which has obviously taken its toll on his health. His reputation has been tarnished, his finances have taken a battering, sold his home to finance his costs etc. Put the sum total together of his 'punishment'...
naomi24 - "Jack, //Why on earth should she concern herself with DLT's family?!?//
In a case like this, I would think very differently to you."
Since Mr Travis does not have children, he and his wife are adults - a factor which influences your thoughts on the victim, why not the criminal's family?
I expect she's feeling out-numbered although the majority on AB and the country at large agree with her. The rest of us don't have the patience to go around in circles all day. I suspect Naomi has some experience of working with 'difficult' children.
I suspect actually Svejk she's realised she's painted herself into a corner and there is no way out without getting her tootsies all painty so she's wandered off for a bit.
No, andy. I really was making a cup of tea - and putting the dogs out for their ablutions. Strange that you should see this discussion as some sort of competition to be won or lost. The verdict has been given, and as far as I can see we're simply raking over the coals.
There is too much challenging our judges. Are we saying that some on the circuit are 'out of touch' or not in the real world? If you gave 10 members of the public a copy of the victim's impact statement you would probably receive 10 different opinions.
It happens all the time in sport, like football. Constant undermining of authority by those who think they know better.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.