She had no need to apologise this is what she actually said.
/// ‘He’s served his time. The rape – and I am not, please, by any means minimising any kind of rape – but the rape was not violent. He didn’t cause any bodily harm to the person. ///
/// ‘It was unpleasant, in a hotel room, I believe, and she was – she had far too much to drink. And you know, that is reprehensible, but he has been convicted and he has served his time. Now when he comes out, what are we supposed to do? Just actually refuse to let him do his job even though he has already been punished?’ ///
She wasn't making any excuse for the rape she was only stating a fact that the rape wasn't violent, which the trial judge had also pointed out "no force involved" and that "the complainant received no injuries".
So does anyone say even after he has served his sentence for what he had done, he should no longer be allowed to carry on in employment for the rest of his life?
Yes he carried out a horrible and disgusting crime but his victim received no physically injury and he did not kill her.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/chloe-madeley-victim-vile-twitter-4440056
/// She continued: “Did I say the rape itself was non-violent? Yes. The judge in the case said he took into account the fact there was "no force involved" and that "the complainant received no injuries".” ///
/// “But let me add that, to me, rape is rape. It is an appalling crime. I was simply reporting the legal facts of this case before commenting,” Judy added. ///