Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
More Nonsense From " Britain First"
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-kent- 2985833 5
Quote from the BBC link :::: "When asked whether the leaflet could be seen to be prejudiced against Muslims, he said ( Paul Golding, from Britain First) "No. Not at all. We've just simply said we're against the mega-mosque. We don't want it built."
Would he have been against a mega church instead ?
Quote from the BBC link :::: "When asked whether the leaflet could be seen to be prejudiced against Muslims, he said ( Paul Golding, from Britain First) "No. Not at all. We've just simply said we're against the mega-mosque. We don't want it built."
Would he have been against a mega church instead ?
Answers
On their website they say, " 5. Britain First stands opposed to all alien and destructive political or religious doctrines, including Marxism, Liberalism, Fascism, National Socialism, Political Correctness, Euro Federalism and Islam. Britain First is a movement of British nationalism, patriotism and democracy. 6. Britain First is committed to...
19:13 Sat 01st Nov 2014
-- answer removed --
If BF appeal, which seems probable, over Royal Mail's refusal to issue the leaflet, it will be very interesting to see what happens.
RM state they will not deliver literature that is deemed to be abusive, threatening, insulting etc. I've not seen this leaflet in its entirety but without exception, I am insulted by claims made by parties who continually twist the facts and figures in an attempt to get our vote. All the main parties are guilty of insulting the electorates intelligence at times!
RM state they will not deliver literature that is deemed to be abusive, threatening, insulting etc. I've not seen this leaflet in its entirety but without exception, I am insulted by claims made by parties who continually twist the facts and figures in an attempt to get our vote. All the main parties are guilty of insulting the electorates intelligence at times!
Britain First appear to be delighted with all the publicity they're getting.
https:/ /www.br itainfi rst.org /royal- mail-re fusal-d eliver- jayda-f ransens -electi on-addr ess-lea ds-medi a-cover age-bon anza/
https:/
naomi24
I do wish people would stop banging on about colour. Culture is the divide – not colour. That said, Mikey, in insisting that ‘we should be opposing the Far Right at every opportunity’ overlooks the fact that there is no group more far right than fundamentalist Islam.
Excellent post (don't you agree, mikey?)
It's always nice to have a new obsession.
I do wish people would stop banging on about colour. Culture is the divide – not colour. That said, Mikey, in insisting that ‘we should be opposing the Far Right at every opportunity’ overlooks the fact that there is no group more far right than fundamentalist Islam.
Excellent post (don't you agree, mikey?)
It's always nice to have a new obsession.
It is amazing that any group that opposes Islam is deemed far right wing, fascist, and racist, or any other derogative description that they can place against them. Yet the group that they are campaigning against, systematically carry out the most horrific and savage crimes, throughout the world.
When we see these 'right-wing' groups carry out similar such crime against those that they oppose, then it will be justifiable to criticise them and take action against them, but until then, let them demonstrate, march, or wave their banners, it is not yet unlawful.
And before someone accuses me of supporting them, I do not, but I do agree with some of their views, but I just don't condemn anyone just because someone tells me to dislike them.
When we see these 'right-wing' groups carry out similar such crime against those that they oppose, then it will be justifiable to criticise them and take action against them, but until then, let them demonstrate, march, or wave their banners, it is not yet unlawful.
And before someone accuses me of supporting them, I do not, but I do agree with some of their views, but I just don't condemn anyone just because someone tells me to dislike them.
AOG - it's all about perspective and you have outlined the reality here.
Which is more unlawful? Demonstrations and marches or the Royal Mail refusing to deliver their literature?
Whatever the merits of the BF argument, people will decide for themselves and not because someone else tells them they don't support them.
Which is more unlawful? Demonstrations and marches or the Royal Mail refusing to deliver their literature?
Whatever the merits of the BF argument, people will decide for themselves and not because someone else tells them they don't support them.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.