Case So Bad, Jury Excused From Service...
News1 min ago
Ed Milliband Less Popular Than Cameron And Clegg
31 Answers
http://
No one on here can accuse me of supporting Labour, but fairs fair, when are the media going to stop attacking Ed Milliband?
Yes we know he hasn't got the media friendly looks that seems to hold sway these days, but he can't help having the looks that he was born with, have we become that shallow that we only go for the smooth faced look of Cameron or Clegg, but then it worked with Blair and look where that led us.
No one on here can accuse me of supporting Labour, but fairs fair, when are the media going to stop attacking Ed Milliband?
Yes we know he hasn't got the media friendly looks that seems to hold sway these days, but he can't help having the looks that he was born with, have we become that shallow that we only go for the smooth faced look of Cameron or Clegg, but then it worked with Blair and look where that led us.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
mikey4444
/// Labour won the landslide election in 1997 and again in 2001 and 2005, all under Blair, so I've never been sure where all this anti-Blair nonsense comes from. /// Iraq maybe, weapons of mass destruction certainly.
/// And if Ed is so unpopular, why are Labour still ahead in the Polls ? ///
Well it can't be because Ed is so popular, if that was so, why are some Labour supporters saying that unless they can get rid of him Labour's chances of winning the election is questionable?
/// I have posted this question many times here on AB but I am still to have an answer that makes sense ! ///
That could prove difficult, when you are only prepared to accept answers that only you yourself agree with.
/// Labour won the landslide election in 1997 and again in 2001 and 2005, all under Blair, so I've never been sure where all this anti-Blair nonsense comes from. /// Iraq maybe, weapons of mass destruction certainly.
/// And if Ed is so unpopular, why are Labour still ahead in the Polls ? ///
Well it can't be because Ed is so popular, if that was so, why are some Labour supporters saying that unless they can get rid of him Labour's chances of winning the election is questionable?
/// I have posted this question many times here on AB but I am still to have an answer that makes sense ! ///
That could prove difficult, when you are only prepared to accept answers that only you yourself agree with.
mikey4444
/// Well...what is your answer then AOG ? ///
/// Question ::::If Ed is so unpopular, why has Labour been consistently ahead in the Polls ? ///
You are asking two questions, "why is Ed so unpopular"? and I think I and others have regularly answered that.
/// why has Labour been consistently ahead in the Polls ? ///
That is not unusual for a party that is in opposition, especially when the party in power has been forced to make unpopular decisions due to the state of the economy, brought on by 13 years of an unwise spending Labour party, plus a world wide depression.
/// Well...what is your answer then AOG ? ///
/// Question ::::If Ed is so unpopular, why has Labour been consistently ahead in the Polls ? ///
You are asking two questions, "why is Ed so unpopular"? and I think I and others have regularly answered that.
/// why has Labour been consistently ahead in the Polls ? ///
That is not unusual for a party that is in opposition, especially when the party in power has been forced to make unpopular decisions due to the state of the economy, brought on by 13 years of an unwise spending Labour party, plus a world wide depression.
mikey4444
/// AOG...thanks for a clear reply ! ///
Thank you you were able to understand it then, not being aggressive you understand, just hoping it fixed the none understanding problem that you highlighted previously.
/// But the American sub-prime market problems and world-wide depression were not caused because the Labour Governments decision to employ more Policemen, Nurses, etc. ///
Now I am the one that is stating that I don't understand your answer. Who opn earth said it was, two different issues here, one World Wide economic problems, and 13 years of an overspending Labour Government.
/// AOG...thanks for a clear reply ! ///
Thank you you were able to understand it then, not being aggressive you understand, just hoping it fixed the none understanding problem that you highlighted previously.
/// But the American sub-prime market problems and world-wide depression were not caused because the Labour Governments decision to employ more Policemen, Nurses, etc. ///
Now I am the one that is stating that I don't understand your answer. Who opn earth said it was, two different issues here, one World Wide economic problems, and 13 years of an overspending Labour Government.
If David couldn't beat Ed in a 2 horse race, then why would he be any better at beating the Tories? Saying Labour would be doing better under David is pointless and unprovable.
The TV debates might help Miliband (or might not).
There has obviously been a caricature drawn which I suspect is inaccurate. Last time Clegg was perceived as a non entity before the TV debates, and the public's perception of him was completely changed when they saw for themselves. Perhaps Miliband can do something similar.
The TV debates might help Miliband (or might not).
There has obviously been a caricature drawn which I suspect is inaccurate. Last time Clegg was perceived as a non entity before the TV debates, and the public's perception of him was completely changed when they saw for themselves. Perhaps Miliband can do something similar.
Latest Posts
Gisèle Pelicot - Husband Jailed...
News1 min ago
Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Society & Culture1 min ago
Quizzes & Puzzles15 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.