My Fault About Hotel With Dirty Room...
Crosswords3 mins ago
Whatever Happenned To The Right To Refuse Service?
63 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It's ridiculous. Hopefully any court will see sense and tell them to *** off.
The key point is that the customer was not refused service because they were gay. They bakery simply declined to accept a particular commission. They would have declined the same commission from straight people as well.
You would hope that bakeries would also have the freedom to decline a commission for a cake with the slogan 'death to f4gs' on it too without fear of prosecution.
The key point is that the customer was not refused service because they were gay. They bakery simply declined to accept a particular commission. They would have declined the same commission from straight people as well.
You would hope that bakeries would also have the freedom to decline a commission for a cake with the slogan 'death to f4gs' on it too without fear of prosecution.
Apparently the cake was to feature Sesame Street's characters Bert and Ernie, surely the bakers could be facing infringement of copyright laws if they were to decorate the cake with these characters, apart from the fact that gay marriages are illegal in Northern Ireland?
Perhaps the Royal Mail should also be taken to court for refusing to carry Britain First election leaflet for the Rochester and Strood by-election?
Perhaps the Royal Mail should also be taken to court for refusing to carry Britain First election leaflet for the Rochester and Strood by-election?
TTT
It still exists.
All service providers still enjoy the right to refuse service, but the Equalities Act provides that consumers cannot be refused service based on the following characteristics:
- Age
- Disability
- Gender reassignment
- Marriage and civil partnership
- Race
- Religion or belief
- Sex
- Sexual orientation
It still exists.
All service providers still enjoy the right to refuse service, but the Equalities Act provides that consumers cannot be refused service based on the following characteristics:
- Age
- Disability
- Gender reassignment
- Marriage and civil partnership
- Race
- Religion or belief
- Sex
- Sexual orientation
The key issue here is that these gay activists happened to unfortunately choose a Christian activist bakery who 'took a stand' based on their Christian beliefs.
Had I been the owner of the bakery, I would have simply stated, "The text on this cake is political, and we do not produce any partisan materials."
This is effectively what bouncers do when they want to keep certain groups out of bars.
If this had been a straight pressure group (say the Coalition for Marriage) who had similarly requested a cake that read 'Marriage = one man / one woman', they would have received service, therefore, the actions of the bakery can be seen as discriminatory.
Perhaps thats what needs to be done...a gay-freindly bakery should be chosen at random and asked to produce such a cake. If they refuse the commission then...
...actually, I don't know what that would prove.
Had I been the owner of the bakery, I would have simply stated, "The text on this cake is political, and we do not produce any partisan materials."
This is effectively what bouncers do when they want to keep certain groups out of bars.
If this had been a straight pressure group (say the Coalition for Marriage) who had similarly requested a cake that read 'Marriage = one man / one woman', they would have received service, therefore, the actions of the bakery can be seen as discriminatory.
Perhaps thats what needs to be done...a gay-freindly bakery should be chosen at random and asked to produce such a cake. If they refuse the commission then...
...actually, I don't know what that would prove.
ludwig
I actually agree with you, in that this case is far more 'nuanced' than the case of the Christian B&B owners.
I've tried to see where discrimination comes into it, and I can just about work it out, but the fact is - the customer wasn't refused service. It was just the specifics of the request which were refused.
I don't think the claimants will win.
I actually agree with you, in that this case is far more 'nuanced' than the case of the Christian B&B owners.
I've tried to see where discrimination comes into it, and I can just about work it out, but the fact is - the customer wasn't refused service. It was just the specifics of the request which were refused.
I don't think the claimants will win.
You will be aware of what happened when Christian landlords refused gay customers a room. One has no right to refuse service except in specific circumstances; justified by society not wishing to treat certain folk unfairly. I tend to sympathise with the bakery, it ought not have been difficult to find one that didn't care, and I suspect deliberately being awkward to go to one that might be expected to object on moral grounds, but that's the way things are going these days.
-- answer removed --
As I understand it, you can refuse service and are not obliged to give a reason.
This would have been the more sensible option for the business.
The 'activist' - and the soubriet hints at a more than averagely litigious nature - may well have known the real reason why his commission was refused, but knowing something and being able to bring a discrimintation case to court are two different things.
This would have been the more sensible option for the business.
The 'activist' - and the soubriet hints at a more than averagely litigious nature - may well have known the real reason why his commission was refused, but knowing something and being able to bring a discrimintation case to court are two different things.
AOG et al
There is nothing in the story to indicate the bakery was targeted.
I don't support the, "Just go somewhere else" principle, because that opens up a pretty nasty set of end points.
Where do we stop?
Should Christian (or whatever religious fundamentalist) employers be allowed to sack people based on race, marital status etc (remember, the Equalites Act encompasses three previous anti-discrimination acts)?
Should this be limited to public sector companies?
Should religious fundamentlists working in the public sector be allowed to discriminate based on their beliefs?
These might seem like extreme examples, but if discrimination laws are waived simply because someone says, "It's against my beliefs" then we must be prepared for some very uncomfortable situations.
The hardline Muslim fundamentalist train driver who refuses to leave the station because he notices some servicemen boarding the train.
Hands up who thinks these servicemen should wait for the next train?
There is nothing in the story to indicate the bakery was targeted.
I don't support the, "Just go somewhere else" principle, because that opens up a pretty nasty set of end points.
Where do we stop?
Should Christian (or whatever religious fundamentalist) employers be allowed to sack people based on race, marital status etc (remember, the Equalites Act encompasses three previous anti-discrimination acts)?
Should this be limited to public sector companies?
Should religious fundamentlists working in the public sector be allowed to discriminate based on their beliefs?
These might seem like extreme examples, but if discrimination laws are waived simply because someone says, "It's against my beliefs" then we must be prepared for some very uncomfortable situations.
The hardline Muslim fundamentalist train driver who refuses to leave the station because he notices some servicemen boarding the train.
Hands up who thinks these servicemen should wait for the next train?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.