Home & Garden1 min ago
Support Of Ukip?
With UKIP's popularity growing, do you see a point between now and the next General Election, where a national newspaper comes out in support of the party?
If so - which paper do you think will be first out of the gate?
I've always found it odd that the Daily Mail hasn't thrown it's weight behind the party as the paper's stance on so many areas dove-tails perfectly with UKIP.
If so - which paper do you think will be first out of the gate?
I've always found it odd that the Daily Mail hasn't thrown it's weight behind the party as the paper's stance on so many areas dove-tails perfectly with UKIP.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Chilldoubt - "andy,
What in the name of Jeezus Aitch Kerrist are you going on about? Are you saying that the Holocaust was NOT genocide?"
Of course I am not saying that. Once again you underline my previous point - you don't read what people post before you answer - incorrectly.
http://
Or are you (as ever) attempting to make some minor point of order that only YOU and you alone appear to have seen and will perpetually do so throughout the thread in order just to 'have the last word'?"
It's not a 'minor point of order' - it's a dictionary definition of a word which you used incorrectly. Not a hanging offence - but you have chosen to go off on one about it - missing the point royally as you go.
"It seems I can only concur with what Sqad said recently so I'll ask this:
From now on, PLEASE do not feel the need to respond to ANYTHING I post and I'll make sure I reciprocate, as I rarely see what exactly it is you're trying to prove."
I do not 'feel the need' to respond to any point anyone makes - I exercise the same right as anyone - I can answer if I choose.
If you prefer not to answer me, that is your right - but I answer as and when I think I have something to contribute - if you prefer not to engage with me, not a problem, there are plenty more AB'ers out there.
Have a good evening.
What in the name of Jeezus Aitch Kerrist are you going on about? Are you saying that the Holocaust was NOT genocide?"
Of course I am not saying that. Once again you underline my previous point - you don't read what people post before you answer - incorrectly.
http://
Or are you (as ever) attempting to make some minor point of order that only YOU and you alone appear to have seen and will perpetually do so throughout the thread in order just to 'have the last word'?"
It's not a 'minor point of order' - it's a dictionary definition of a word which you used incorrectly. Not a hanging offence - but you have chosen to go off on one about it - missing the point royally as you go.
"It seems I can only concur with what Sqad said recently so I'll ask this:
From now on, PLEASE do not feel the need to respond to ANYTHING I post and I'll make sure I reciprocate, as I rarely see what exactly it is you're trying to prove."
I do not 'feel the need' to respond to any point anyone makes - I exercise the same right as anyone - I can answer if I choose.
If you prefer not to answer me, that is your right - but I answer as and when I think I have something to contribute - if you prefer not to engage with me, not a problem, there are plenty more AB'ers out there.
Have a good evening.
I think the point about 4 million UKIP voters is not worth comparing to the numbers killed in a genocide - it's worth comparing to the number of voters for other parties.
It's also worth mentioning that UK elections are not necessarily a numbers game. You can get less votes overall than your opponent, but still get a majority of seats if they are in the right places.
It's also worth mentioning that UK elections are not necessarily a numbers game. You can get less votes overall than your opponent, but still get a majority of seats if they are in the right places.
