Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Women May Possibly Join Infantry Units By 2016
75 Answers
No, no, no, no, no! It's a total recipe for disaster. We've been through this before and it would IMHO be detrimental.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -305391 11
This(and similar incidents) has been discussed at length previously on AB, I'll post links as I'm unsure the 'Related Threads' thingy will work:
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/News /Questi on12101 31-3.ht ml
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/News /Questi on13535 48-2.ht ml
http://
This(and similar incidents) has been discussed at length previously on AB, I'll post links as I'm unsure the 'Related Threads' thingy will work:
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ChillDoubt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes you're right, you didn't mention a ratio of 6:1 and I misread that. Still, it doesn't follow that units will always follow the ratio of men to women who pass training. There will be variations around that, from units with no women to perhaps even all-female units.
In the end it's about who is capable. The rest will sort itself out with time. Like all other previously male-dominated institutions, once women joined there was a teething period and then no-one cared any more. I don't see any reason for the front-line to be different.
In the end it's about who is capable. The rest will sort itself out with time. Like all other previously male-dominated institutions, once women joined there was a teething period and then no-one cared any more. I don't see any reason for the front-line to be different.
Could they always be depended on to pull the trigger?
I'm thinking of an incident here in Belfast. The army had intelligence that an attack was going to be carried out against civilians in the Ardoyne area. It duly happened and a man walking along the street was shot dead by gunmen on a motorcycle.
An army unit, a man and a woman, chased the bike in their car and crashed into it. The driver jumped out and shot one of the two killers. The woman soldier drew her gun but for some reason didn't fire.
I'm thinking of an incident here in Belfast. The army had intelligence that an attack was going to be carried out against civilians in the Ardoyne area. It duly happened and a man walking along the street was shot dead by gunmen on a motorcycle.
An army unit, a man and a woman, chased the bike in their car and crashed into it. The driver jumped out and shot one of the two killers. The woman soldier drew her gun but for some reason didn't fire.
Phil Hammond said they would 'water down' the physical requirements needed to serve on the front line. I doubt they can operate a two-tier system so it looks like a lowering of standards all around. Still, maybe that's considered a price worth paying to satisfy the 'whims' of what I suspect is a handful of women.
I can't see any big issues. Regardless of gender each will know the risks, and know the indignities. Sheer muscle strength would be a disadvantage but the aim is not to let the enemy get that close. I am unconvinced one gender should be sheltered from such an awful situation whilst the other is expected to get on with it.
//Mr Fallon has ordered an 18-month review of training procedures and the physical demands of fighting to ensure the change can be made without damaging female soldiers' health.//
I hope in effect that doesn't mean a 'dumbing down' of standards. When I applied to join the RM's, many years ago now, I was a very strong, fit Lad and I had to work *** hard to achieve my aim I can assure you!
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.