Donate SIGN UP

Should The Whole World Be Free To Be Able To Travel To An Live In?

Avatar Image
Broseph | 11:51 Sat 25th Apr 2015 | News
157 Answers
I don't mean the traveling costs but the barriers that stop immigrants and travelers from going wherever they want to?

Anyone should be able to travel to anywhere whenever they like and live there if they feel like it's the right place to them.

No one owns the globe do they? Who has the right to tell me I can't travel and settle down wherever I feel like.

What would be the pros and cons of this new system in your opinion?
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 157rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Broseph. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
Retrocop I provided a link once the rules were understood.

Here it is again as you've obviously missed it.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/19/immigration-policy-ukip-restrictions-european-union

"A world with no divide or barriers. Think about it. "

yeah, natures thought about it...its called the survival of the fittest....

Oh dear Broseph, you have really riled the cliques on here !
Question Author
/Back to school on Monday,then Bro....Where you can tell all your chums how you were on a grown-ups site and was winding all us old codgers up.Grow up you spotty little Herbert./

Icey,if I can call you that...I work,have used the internet since it was public,am not winding anyone up and am not spotty,little or a herbert.

Do you have any opinions on my op rather than being enraged at a character you've made up and judged wrongly?
Not riled,Whirly...Just amazed at such naivety.
Question Author
/Oh dear Broseph, you have really riled the cliques on here !/

Aah,that would explain the weird chummery here. It appears that that to have a different or strong opinion brings out the worst in people which isn't my intention at all.
-- answer removed --
Question Author
/Not riled,Whirly...Just amazed at such naivety./

You said /Back to school on Monday,then Bro....Where you can tell all your chums how you were on a grown-ups site and was winding all us old codgers up.Grow up you spotty little Herbert./

If this is you just being amazed I'd be too scared to rile you in any way.
Question Author
/"Imagine there's no countries. It's easy if you try"/

For some,yes for others it appears impossible and is vastly offensive.
That link,which you finally provided has nothing to do with your ideas of utopia.
It is to do with EU immigration policy and the concerns that it now provides.It does not address your rights to think you can go and do as you like. Who else said in that link,"Anyone should be able to travel anywhere whenever they like and live there if they feel it's the right place to them".
Your thoughts seem totally irrelevant to the link you provided.
I'm still with you Broseph!

Im still waiting on my one way ticket to that tropical island though :-)
Question Author
Sorry retrocop I strongly disagree and believe that it is very valid to the op which is indeed about immigration. Are you this argumentative irl? It's a lighthearted hypothetical debate. Please don't take it so personally.
Question Author
Thank you boo. You appear to see this thread in the way it was intended and not as a personal attack on your values which is nice.
OK.I see you,re not a 13 year old schoolboy....Your not an illegal people smuggler out in Libya,are you?
//It's a lighthearted hypothetical debate.///
So we can agree at last. It is NOT news then!!
..or living on a rubbih dump just outside Calais....
"rubbish"
Back to your light hearted hypothetical debate.
CONS: Countries tend to be tribal. Ghettoes form when outsiders decide to plonk them selves in another country of their choice. Jews will hardly fit in if they go on mass to Mecca to live.Likewise Muslims living in Israel.They have their ghetto.Sunnis don't get on with shia.etc etc.
Tribal domination and warlords. It don't work.
But isn't most tribal wars fought over land? And who believes they own it? If this was no longer necessary and EVERYONE could settle where they wished would these wars still happen?

Yes it is a Utopian view and yes may be such a hypothetical question such as this would be better placed in say CB or possibly S&C, but it's a nice thought provoking idea/pondering innit?
The theory seems ok but I don't think it would work.

61 to 80 of 157rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Should The Whole World Be Free To Be Able To Travel To An Live In?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.