I am in no way apologising for his drinking, self inflicted of course and let us not forget he was not the only person in this case to be awarded damages.
Should those payments have been made? I have no idea - but equally should be Press be allowed to encroach on one's every move and phone call?
// Imagine ... having your private life gone in to publicly //
Is Paul Gascoyne, who has lived his entire life on the front (and back) pages of the tabloids, and in books, suggesting that he is not accustomed to having his private life gone into publicly?
So, we should all be accepting of the fact that if we ring or voicemail our family and pour our heart out about a personal problem - it's up for grabs?
I'm sure everybody on here would be just fine with that.
//But some of us would pour our problems out to our friends or family//
He did!! On his phone, which had been hacked, so when what he had said appeared in the Media, he thought (in his low mental state) he was being betrayed by those he trusted.
Having his phone hacked contributed to his alcoholism ...
All down to that mean, nasty phone hacking person.
Your OP contradicts itself, JJ.
If I remember rightly Paul Gascoigne was accusing his family and friends of leaking stories to the press, so obviously this phone hacking contributed to whatever problems he had.
Mamya, I believe this was also true of many other people who were hacked: they thought those they trusted were selling stories about them to the press. (I think Elle Macpherson sacked her innocent PA for this reason.)
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.