Linda, your response to Mikey has probably been subject to the curse of the badly constructed AB advert - when this happens the long running scripts boost your PC's memory usage for your browser to well over 500Meg - this temporarily freezes the site and if you happen to be typing at the time, lots of text just gets lost. it's been increasingly prevalent recently and i'm getting a bit poked off with it.
Mikey. It's strange the first para didn't scan! This is it:
//I really thought you would have something to say about these cover. Ups. You are normally very. Coal when it. Ones to child abuse. Your only reaction is to drag up a Tory story. I am very disappointed with you. //
If you read my response to Gromit I only pointed out thAt he has always been hesitant to reply to criticism. I am still waiting my explanation where he said Thatcher closed down the coal mines. He never did. And you respond by making comments implicating a dead man just because he was a Tory. Hopefully all these stones will be turned over during the inquiry on child abuse. I do hope Corbyn will be amongst the worms! But not until after he wins the Labour Leadership race!!
Mush,
If an independent Report criticised a sitting MP, we would know about it. The redactions are unfortunate, but claiming Corbyn could be mentioned in the bits that are blacked out, is a bit desperate.
No idea what post I was suppose to get back to you on. If you have a link, I'll take a look. I do know that Labour started the process of mine closures, so I doubt I would deny it.
Linda...just read Mushes post. I haven't come across this situation before because I don't have any adverts on my version of AB. Not sure why, unless its because I use adblock.
But I would still appreciate you repeating the paragraph in plain English please.
//How come tory voters are never bothered about the fact that Margaret employed peadophiles and pushed for a knighthood for the UK's no.1 peadophile?//
at the time, voters didn't know that. do you really think public opinion would have ignored it if they had?
// Is This Man Fit To Be A Labour Party Leader// On one statement alone I would say YES. He has promised to re-nationalise rail travel. That alone without anything else gets my vote. Whoever thought up the present situation where different parts of a railway system are owned by differing private companies is obviously a few slices short of a loaf. Let's get back to a sensible British Rail ASAP
how can they? thatcher is dead, and was effectively senile for years before that. she has never been called to account; you're usually among the first to condemn trial by kangaroo, why should this situation be different?