Quizzes & Puzzles25 mins ago
Racism Against Whites Exists In Africa.
163 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-34 26266/W hite-Zi mbabwea n-farmi ng-fami ly-driv en-land -make-w ay-blac k-Briti sh-doct or.html
As suggested by one reader, the British Government should now seize the GPs property here and use it to compensate the evicted farmer.
As suggested by one reader, the British Government should now seize the GPs property here and use it to compensate the evicted farmer.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't think that is a fair, or even reasonable solution.
The fault likes with Mr Mugabe's policies, which are in keeping with his general policies towards white people in his country.
I am sure you would not consider any such arrangements for the black people forced off land by whites in African countries, which has certainly ben the case in the past - so it is not practical to try and do so here and now.
The fault likes with Mr Mugabe's policies, which are in keeping with his general policies towards white people in his country.
I am sure you would not consider any such arrangements for the black people forced off land by whites in African countries, which has certainly ben the case in the past - so it is not practical to try and do so here and now.
It would seem that Mr Rankin and many other white farmer's contribution to the, already , poor economy to Zimbabwe are no longer required by Mr Mugabe.
Obviously the good Doctor is considered a good viable economic asset and is worth more than the generations of white farmrs efforts.
Just stop pouring economic aid into the country and see how they fare with their indigenous population installed in these farms!
o
Obviously the good Doctor is considered a good viable economic asset and is worth more than the generations of white farmrs efforts.
Just stop pouring economic aid into the country and see how they fare with their indigenous population installed in these farms!
o
retrocop - //It would seem that Mr Rankin and many other white farmer's contribution to the, already , poor economy to Zimbabwe are no longer required by Mr Mugabe. //
I would suggest that the contributions to do not actually go towards the economy in Zimbabwe, but rather go towards the economy in Mr Mugabe's bank accounts.
I am sure therefore that the flow of profits will be maintained as they are now, regardless of who is running the farm.
I would suggest that the contributions to do not actually go towards the economy in Zimbabwe, but rather go towards the economy in Mr Mugabe's bank accounts.
I am sure therefore that the flow of profits will be maintained as they are now, regardless of who is running the farm.
bazwillrun - //"Just stop pouring economic aid into the country and see how they fare with their indigenous population installed in these farms! "
exactly...they just sit around on their haunches with one hand on their forehead...they couldnt run a tap let alone a farm... //
That is a presumption that may be based more on cultural stereotyping than actual fact.
exactly...they just sit around on their haunches with one hand on their forehead...they couldnt run a tap let alone a farm... //
That is a presumption that may be based more on cultural stereotyping than actual fact.
Talbot - //That is an interesting and at the same time surprising comment, Jack. //
I am unsure what is surprising - unless anyone finds the centuries of previous systematic exploitation of the indigenous population in terms of their lands and their labour by invading white people to be a surprise.
I don't - anyone else?
I am unsure what is surprising - unless anyone finds the centuries of previous systematic exploitation of the indigenous population in terms of their lands and their labour by invading white people to be a surprise.
I don't - anyone else?
Not unusual to see the usual apologists who are quite willing to see one of their own, his wife and three children kicked off their own farm, because they happen to be white.
All this talk about how the whites forced the blacks off their land lol lol.
Most of this land was a dust bowl until the white settlers irrigated it and then cultivated it, it then attracted the natives from in where they lived, attracted by the better living conditions, that they could enjoy by working on these farms.
All this talk about how the whites forced the blacks off their land lol lol.
Most of this land was a dust bowl until the white settlers irrigated it and then cultivated it, it then attracted the natives from in where they lived, attracted by the better living conditions, that they could enjoy by working on these farms.
Talbot - //I wasn't addressing the comment to you.
But seen as you think you are a spokesperson for Jth .... You think racism is sometimes ok? //
I assume your post is directed at me Talbot? If not, my apologies.
I don't for one minute think I am a spokesman for jack - in my experience she is more than capable of speaking for herself - I was merely making a comment, which I think is valid in the spirit of debate.
And no, I don't think racism is ever OK - I am unsure how you have reached that conclusion, but I am happy to correct your impression.
But seen as you think you are a spokesperson for Jth .... You think racism is sometimes ok? //
I assume your post is directed at me Talbot? If not, my apologies.
I don't for one minute think I am a spokesman for jack - in my experience she is more than capable of speaking for herself - I was merely making a comment, which I think is valid in the spirit of debate.
And no, I don't think racism is ever OK - I am unsure how you have reached that conclusion, but I am happy to correct your impression.
-- answer removed --
AOG - //Not unusual to see the usual apologists who are quite willing to see one of their own, his wife and three children kicked off their own farm, because they happen to be white. //
When you refer to 'one of their own' - do you mean because the farmer is white? It can't be because he is British, since I don't believe he is.
In that case, he is not 'one of our own' simply by virtue of his skin colour - that would be racist would it not?
Whereas the doctor is indeed 'one of our own' - because he is British.
So if we are basing this on nationality, then you should have no problem at a South African being displaced by a British citizen.
When you refer to 'one of their own' - do you mean because the farmer is white? It can't be because he is British, since I don't believe he is.
In that case, he is not 'one of our own' simply by virtue of his skin colour - that would be racist would it not?
Whereas the doctor is indeed 'one of our own' - because he is British.
So if we are basing this on nationality, then you should have no problem at a South African being displaced by a British citizen.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.