Crosswords1 min ago
Britain First
Do you think that this is intimidating, or a justified form of protest?
http:// indy100 .indepe ndent.c o.uk/ar ticle/b ritain- first-t ried-to -invade -a-hala l-slaug hterhou se-it-w ent-ver y-badly --ZJx_7 ZbKWMb
http://
Answers
I understand the disquiet regarding Halal slaughter and a belief that it is wrong, mainly because there is no compulsion to stun; but her argument is all over the place. She has made errors in her indignation and so made a fool of herself. The problem is that someone full of anger and emotion has been put into a position of spokeswoman when the role needs someone...
16:22 Thu 05th May 2016
mikey4444
What a frightful woman this Jayda Fransen is !
I haven't heard of this harridan before, and I hope I don't again in the near future.
Wow ... why ever not? after all it was you that introduced me to Britain First. I gather you had done a bit of research, I guess I was wrong.
Not a justified form of protest imo.
What a frightful woman this Jayda Fransen is !
I haven't heard of this harridan before, and I hope I don't again in the near future.
Wow ... why ever not? after all it was you that introduced me to Britain First. I gather you had done a bit of research, I guess I was wrong.
Not a justified form of protest imo.
I understand the disquiet regarding Halal slaughter and a belief that it is wrong, mainly because there is no compulsion to stun; but her argument is all over the place. She has made errors in her indignation and so made a fool of herself. The problem is that someone full of anger and emotion has been put into a position of spokeswoman when the role needs someone of intellectual ability who will check what they are claiming is all factual. Offerings to Satan or whatever that rant was. Can only please the already converted.
Talbot....I am reasonably familiar with Paul Golding, the current head of Britain First but try not to think of this odious organization too much, thus Franzen slipped under the wire. And we both agree, I think, that this invasion of a perfectly legitimate business wasn't justified.
But herein lies a mystery. BF counts as one of its various self-appointed duties, the "defence" of Jewish areas of London. As I understand it, Jewish and Muslim slaughterhouses employ very similar methods in dispatching animals.
So if BF were so concerned for the welfare of animals in slaughterhouses, they would also be protesting at Jewish places, but for some reason or other, they choose to restrict their violent protests to Muslim ones exclusively !
Now thats a funny thing, isn't it ?
But herein lies a mystery. BF counts as one of its various self-appointed duties, the "defence" of Jewish areas of London. As I understand it, Jewish and Muslim slaughterhouses employ very similar methods in dispatching animals.
So if BF were so concerned for the welfare of animals in slaughterhouses, they would also be protesting at Jewish places, but for some reason or other, they choose to restrict their violent protests to Muslim ones exclusively !
Now thats a funny thing, isn't it ?
Talbot...it appears that you have misunderstood my view on anti-semitism and the Labour Party, which may, in part, be due to me not making my position abundantly clear.
Anti-semitism is always to be abhorred, as any other time type of racism is, by anybody, at any time.
My comments about a storm, ( in a medium-sized ) tea cup was directed at the media frenzy over this recent issue for the Labour Party. While there has been, without doubt, some elements of anti-semitism, by a few Party Members, there is still no evidence that anti-semitism is institutional within the Party.
All Parties have their rogue elements and loose cannons.
Anti-semitism is always to be abhorred, as any other time type of racism is, by anybody, at any time.
My comments about a storm, ( in a medium-sized ) tea cup was directed at the media frenzy over this recent issue for the Labour Party. While there has been, without doubt, some elements of anti-semitism, by a few Party Members, there is still no evidence that anti-semitism is institutional within the Party.
All Parties have their rogue elements and loose cannons.