Donate SIGN UP

Is This Photo Amazing Or Whats Your Take On It?

Avatar Image
piggynose | 21:31 Mon 11th Jul 2016 | News
250 Answers
well what do you think? Media URL: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36759711
Description:
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 250rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Thanks for the link T. Do we k ow what date those figures were published ?
I asked to point it out to you that it is your answers (unless mine are unfairly removed like the above) that get removed when you come on here all guns blazing. Maybe you need anger management treatment?
Hilarious :-) night night.
2015

502 white,
250 were black
163 were Hispanic/Latino
18 were Asian/Pacific Islander
13 were American Indian
54 were other/unknown


There are many statistics that should be taken into account if you have an agenda you just want to highlight the figures that suit.
The problem with all the stats (whichever source they come from) is that you are rarely comparing like with like.

The only useful figure would be the difference in the chances of getting shot across a range of different ages/sexes/ethnicities who were all behaving in exactly the same way in their interaction with the police .

Which figure is impossible to produce - so we are back to skewed reporting, cherry-picked statistics and the agenda of whichever news machine produces the report.

It appears that young black men are more likely (per capita) to get shot - but how much of that can be laid at the door of their societal upbringing and attitudes, rather than racist/corrupt police?

Every black victim is suddenly a saintly, church going, polite young man in the eyes of his community - is this likely?

I have no idea of the answer - just that the problem is probably not as simple as "racist cops shoot too many blacks"
Jno's data was 2016 so far.......
And?
Sensible post SD. Not what I thought I was going to read.
btw the statistics I posted @ 01:22 Tue 12th Jul 2016 were from The Guardian


...which is biased.
Biased in favour of whom?
The extreme left.
It may appear embarassingly gauche but am I the only one who didn't find the picture terribly striking? It's a powerful image but I wouldn't have it down as a contender for a Pulitzer Prize or even the shortlist.
It's ok, but mine was better ;-)
...wasn't it, Mick? ;-)
...oh dear, he's quietly boiling with rage!
This thread isn't about you but if you want to start a new thread I will promise to join in.
Again maybe not a Pulitzer winner, but I was there, the silence was eerie and I did what I could (manual Takumar 50mm lens from the 1970s no less!)
Don't be bitter, Mick ;-)

61 to 80 of 250rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is This Photo Amazing Or Whats Your Take On It?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.