Seeing as it seems to be the main priority that determines your vote, Naomi, what's your opinion of the uncosted Conservative promises? Like £8bn to the NHS (uncosted), £4bn for schools, moving the civil service out of London, planting a million trees, more buses with low emisssions and lovely videoscreens, etc. etc.. Do they bother you? Or does your unclouded 20/20 vision not register them as important?
My own reasons for supporting Labour aren't out of some naive ideological commitment to socialism or whatever you think it is when you call it "red mist." I just think they're the only one of the two parties who are interested in solving what I see as the biggest problems with our public services - that they are being turned into profiteering outlets for the private sector at the expense of vulnerable people who need them. His plans for an investment bank look to me like a mirror of a very successful policy being pursued in Canada, and while his costings aren't wholly convincing, they don't look to me as "pie-in-the-sky" as the press is making them out to be and I appreciate that the party is being honest about the need to raise taxes if we want our services to be funded properly. (I also don't accept that the raises they've proposed are sufficient to cause businesses to migrate).
There are things I fervently dislike about the party too. Although I support rail nationalisation, I really don't see the point in doing it for utilities, I very strongly dislike Corbyn's record on the IRA and his slipperiness over answering questions about it, and I strongly dislike Diane Abbott both as a person and as a candidate for Home Sec. But part of being a reasoning adult voter is trying to carefully balance the pros and cons based on what's important to you, and that's all I and most Labour-inclined voters have done. I resent being called stupid or naive or "ideological" for that when I'm just trying to vote based on what I think the best option for the country is, just like you are.