Question Author
naomi24
"when you argued that you don't mention gays in unrelated threads"
I challenged you to provide evidence, and you didn't. That was before. This is after (chronologically speaking). In the future, today will be the past, so have at it.
However, the point I was making was valid in that I was referring to AOG hot button topics. It's fair to say that the subjects I listed are a reference, right? It would be weird if I left that out of the list (check AOG's threads over the past 12 months).
I think what you were alluding to in that previous thread was the idea that I subvert threads to make them about gay issues. Is that right?
Do you think that's what is happening here?
Or with hindsight, do you think you may have kicked ball into the stands?
Regarding your post of 22:43 last night - let's analyse it.
It has seven subject areas.
1. Discussion of mikey4444 - that's contextually irrelevant to my selection.
2. The KKK - relevant, but then you change to a third subject area...
3. The Far Right.
4. The reasons behind malcontent.
5. Political correctness.
6. The race card is then duly played.
7. The playing field.
If you look at the seven subject areas, I refer to number five because it makes little sense within or without the context of the question.
If someone is tired of being branded a bigot, joining the Nazis or KKK is not the best action plan.