Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Its Very Simple, Do As The Police Tell You.
Its very sad but just comply with the police commands.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-us- canada- 4130257 1
Dave.
http://
Dave.
Answers
///He may have had a gun, refused to comply to the officers commands, perfectly responsible, this isn't the movies where you hit an arm or leg and go and arrest him/// Correct, ///Police encountered Scout Schultz, 21, outside a campus dormitory in Atlanta after a call about "a person with a knife and a gun"/// In my experience if you are in a Job where you are...
19:45 Mon 18th Sep 2017
I don't think that not instantly complying with the police should be a capital offence with a summary execution to follow, as a rule.
Since they were holding a knife I don't have a problem with the police treating them as a threat, but it simply cannot be right that the ultimate sanction is deployed so often in the US. Where is the middle ground, where someone can be incapacitated without being killed, and why does it seem to be used so little in the US? Or, at least, used not nearly enough.
Since they were holding a knife I don't have a problem with the police treating them as a threat, but it simply cannot be right that the ultimate sanction is deployed so often in the US. Where is the middle ground, where someone can be incapacitated without being killed, and why does it seem to be used so little in the US? Or, at least, used not nearly enough.
// the police can't take any risks if someone may have a gun. //
yes but HE knew he didnt have one.....
so he would wonder why had the police drawn their weapons on him ?
[ came up in or with the Gibraltar terroristen
bam bam bamma lamma bam bam !
now dead terroristen - 1988
and the police when they were asked said - oh we thought they were going for their guns - and we were in imminent mortal danger - so we opened fire
[ this of course would mean the police had opened fire completely lawfully - see the stephen waldorf case]
and the counsel for the IRA ( excuse me what did you just write?) asked "they knew they didnt have any - so why were they going for guns they knew they didnt have?"
To which there was a bit of a limp reply " search me gov - but that is what they were doing"
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Opera tion_Fl avius
comment at the time that the Chinese Parliament ( private police debrief to get the story all from the same hymn book ) had gone badly wrong
yes but HE knew he didnt have one.....
so he would wonder why had the police drawn their weapons on him ?
[ came up in or with the Gibraltar terroristen
bam bam bamma lamma bam bam !
now dead terroristen - 1988
and the police when they were asked said - oh we thought they were going for their guns - and we were in imminent mortal danger - so we opened fire
[ this of course would mean the police had opened fire completely lawfully - see the stephen waldorf case]
and the counsel for the IRA ( excuse me what did you just write?) asked "they knew they didnt have any - so why were they going for guns they knew they didnt have?"
To which there was a bit of a limp reply " search me gov - but that is what they were doing"
https:/
comment at the time that the Chinese Parliament ( private police debrief to get the story all from the same hymn book ) had gone badly wrong
This is a constant problem in a country where anyone is very likely to be carrying a gun. It simply would not happen in the UK.
The Police in the USA must constantly be aware that anyone can be armed with a gun and act accordingly.
I have mentioned the US question site Quora of which I am a member. On that site there are frequent references to how good the UK police are in comparison to the USA. Here getting shot dead by a policeman is a vanishingly small possibility, in the USA such cases are a daily occurrence. Most cases do not even get past the local press into the national news.
The Police in the USA must constantly be aware that anyone can be armed with a gun and act accordingly.
I have mentioned the US question site Quora of which I am a member. On that site there are frequent references to how good the UK police are in comparison to the USA. Here getting shot dead by a policeman is a vanishingly small possibility, in the USA such cases are a daily occurrence. Most cases do not even get past the local press into the national news.
The thing about that is that he didn't have a gun, so he wasn't as much of a threat as he's being made out to be. Granted, he might have, but if you shoot someone dead because they might be a threat and they turn out not to be -- and get away with it, time after time after time -- then you have a broken system. The job of the police is to protect its citizens, not kill them.
I don't want to think that if I don't instantly comply perfectly with the police's commands, however unreasonable, then my life will be forfeit.
I don't want to think that if I don't instantly comply perfectly with the police's commands, however unreasonable, then my life will be forfeit.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.