SPATH, on 20.2.18 in his High Court decision, the Judge said of the father,
"His knowledge of the paperwork and the medical records was prodigious. His understanding of the functioning of the brain and his exploration of competing hypothesis was remarkable. At one point in the evidence
when he had asked a question of particular complexity I asked him if somebody had
been providing the questions for him. He told me, entirely convincingly, that he had written it out a moment or two before. His uncle, sitting next to him, confirmed it.
F left school at 16. He served an apprenticeship as a plasterer. It says much about his commitment to his son and the time and energy he has directed to this case that he has absorbed the issues so completely and intelligently."