Donate SIGN UP

"chequers"

Avatar Image
Khandro | 21:51 Fri 03rd Aug 2018 | News
54 Answers
The Chequers plan is rubbish, I have yet to hear anyone of any political persuasion think it is a good or even workable proposal, and yet the media is spinning it as if we should all be on tenterhooks to see if our dear leader can pull it off against EU adversity.
What is needed is either a completely different plan (enter Boris?) or no deal at all.
Would you agree?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 54rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The UK cannot be allowed to be better off after Brexit - we must be punished and humiliated.

Bring on the no deal

We have stood alone against foreign invaders, and will do so again.
No ai would not agree.
Boris is past history. He missed his opportunity, and his stock amongst Tory MPs (who can elect him) is very low. Boris’ hard brexit plan would be totally dismissed by the EU.
When the chequers Plan was revealed I said that the EU would bat it back wanting changes, and that after some last minute quibbling, there would be an agreement. I still stand by that, that is how it will pan out.
I'm damn sure that is right. But would it meet any moral standard of "Leave"?

I'm addressing the question to people who care about such things.
"such things" meaning moral standards.
We need a clean break. just walk away, we could do that today, but they won't.
We do 45% of our trade with the EU. If we walk away without working out how future trade will work, then we risk losing it all. If we do not honour our obligations that we signed up to, and leave without paying them, then no one will trust us again in the future. Doing a midnight flit is not really an option in the 21st Century.
Question Author
"Gung-Ho!" sounds exiting, but it should be possible among grown-ups to find a mutually beneficial arrangement - and "Chequers" ain't it. The Brits shouldn't cut off their nose to spite their face, but but the EU negotiator (trying to make a name for himself 'cos he wants J.C.Junker's job next) Barnier, has tried at every step to be unhelpful and obstructive, to teach the 'miscreants' a lesson for fear of contagion within the EU dream.
Everything you might want to know about the UK's trade with the EU is on here;
https://fullfact.org/europe/uk-eu-trade/ The graph showing the balance of trade with Germany alone is quite staggering and it is in their interests alone, that there should be a sensible outcome.
May's attempt to sell it to Macron has failed.Rejected out of hand.
The question is, what really are our obligations. The EU wants continued contribution to that which we were involved in as members, but being an ex-member is a different situation.

Staying part of and continuing to contribute to projects that benefit us isn't so bad, but continuing to pay for that which is part of a club to which we no longer belong, and which the contract didn't stipulate continuing to contrnute after leaving, isn't reasonable.

We are leaving anyway IF our politicians are to be believed, so 'flit' doesn't come into it. These negotiations are about future trade relationships and saying, "No", to bad deals and leaving without agreement is perfectly honorable.

What isn't honorable is demanding unreasonable criteria that would leave us in the EU in all but name, as the EU would continue to make rules we'd be forced to obey. The sensible conclusion from the "discussions" so far is that the EU should be the party untrusted in the future.

The UK, on the other hand, is likely to be seen as the weak push-over in the future, given May's record so far. That might change slightly if we feel forced to go for no deal.
CONTRIBUTE
Can you stop posting one-word screamy capital-letter typo corrections, OG? It's really not necessary.

Agreed Jim. Very annoying. As has been said, we all know what you mean. No need for corrections.
It's necessary for me.
An editing facility could avoid the necessity.
OG, we don't have one and we're not likely to get one so there's no point in going on about it. It's boring. Everyone else seems to manage without moaning all the time.
Stubborn isn’t the word.
Then folk can stop complaining when I put the correction in.
:o/
We're not so thick we can't tell what you meant OG. I thought you had stopped it but obviously not.
Obviously.
Question Author
Don't let them intimidate you OG!

21 to 40 of 54rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

"chequers"

Answer Question >>