Food & Drink0 min ago
Cake Off?
183 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-north ern-ire land-45 789759
The road to common sense is paved with tenners.
The road to common sense is paved with tenners.
Answers
This whole process was never going to be a cakewalk, which in itself raised issues which would end in a verbal bun fight. Still, hopefully not many tiers were shed by those who made a stand and everybody will get their slice....... . I’ll get me coat!
10:55 Wed 10th Oct 2018
chill: "In all seriousness I don’t see why they couldn’t have just gone to Asda with their own design and had it made there, thousands of other people manage to on a weekly basis. " - you miss the point, this is the Gay activist movement. they deliberately seek out places to offend then overreact when those places duly oblige.
SP:"To those who say that no business should be forced to perform a service - they HAVE to." - err no, the basic tennet of retail is that the management reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason. So if they don't want to serve people wearing red jumpers on Tuesday they don't have to and they don't even have to explain why.
The bakery had no objection in serving the guy , because he is gay .
What they objected to was baking a cake with that message on it ; and would have so refused if he was straight .
The same objection would have been there to anyone , whether straight or gay , with such a commission
So , where is the discrimination ?
What they objected to was baking a cake with that message on it ; and would have so refused if he was straight .
The same objection would have been there to anyone , whether straight or gay , with such a commission
So , where is the discrimination ?
^^^and you absolutely were right to make the point.
The bakers have not discriminated - they just didn't like the message.
The B&B owners did discriminate - they refused a room just because the couple were gay.
The former is absolutely fine as confirmed by the Supreme Court (despite Rockrose deciding they were wrong) whereas the latter in my view is entirely wrong for the reasons discussed many many times in the past.
The bakers have not discriminated - they just didn't like the message.
The B&B owners did discriminate - they refused a room just because the couple were gay.
The former is absolutely fine as confirmed by the Supreme Court (despite Rockrose deciding they were wrong) whereas the latter in my view is entirely wrong for the reasons discussed many many times in the past.