Donate SIGN UP

Whoopee! A Third Brexit Option

Avatar Image
rich47 | 22:29 Wed 14th Nov 2018 | News
74 Answers
It is good news that Theresa has now conceded that there are three options.
Bad deal, no deal or ( the obviously best option) no Brexit.
Who could ask for anything more?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 74rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by rich47. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Could ask for her to have started with that one from the word go?
What would be the justification for abandoning Brexit, then? Would it be that it's proved a bit tricky to secure an acceptable deal? Strange, but I don't recall that caveat being mentioned on the ballot paper I marked.
no deal is by far the best of what's available at the moment.
The referendum should have been

A) Get Farage to guide us through the storm

B) Give up the idea
You're a very patient man, NJ.
If a deal is agreed, it's guaranteed that no one voted for it.
//don't recall that caveat being mentioned on the ballot paper I marked//

Yes it did, NJ. It was the other option to "Leave".
I presume you ticked the "Leave" box on the assumption that it didn't mean "Remain.
^That's what I did. Did I misunderstand the question?
Patently.
No Brexit would be a betrayal of the nation and of democracy. Only a small nunber of immoral MPs would suggest or support that. And we all already know that no deal beats a bad deal hands down. Even May knows that. So, nothing much changed of late then.
The fact that this deal, in all its horridness, has been accepted shows that Theresa May knows the exact opposite. No deal is the worst of all worlds.
‘Only a small nunber of immoral MPs would suggest or support that’

Well, we’ll see when parliament votes just how many fall into your ‘immoral’ category. But I bet it ain’t small!
//No deal is the worst of all worlds. //

Don't you believe it!
Any acceptance would be down to a combination of remainers in the cabinet, and leavers who were persuaded their party (or their career maybe) would suffer if it was rejected. There can't be many who think remaining with even less say/power, and throwing away many the advantages Brexit was voted for, is better than anything else that could be achieved instead.
//No deal is the worst of all worlds//

Not to a self-confident nation which values its freedom and trusts in its ability and courage to meet the difficult problems following a nno-deal Brexit and overcome them.

I acknowledge that the moral qualities I'm referring to are more dilute than they were sixty years ago, Jim. So - for that reason - you may be right.
That’s a dangerous assumption.
That was to OG.
PS: but only for that reason.
I don't think you need to be too harsh: after all, there's also pragmatism, which is at times a worthwhile quality.

1 to 20 of 74rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Whoopee! A Third Brexit Option

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.