Any thinking person with any moral fibre whatsoever should, if they have a platform, use it to do good. She has a massive platform and clearly believes in what she's saying and tbh I can't disagree with her, although I don't personally like the woman.
Yes but that's my point, if you could get a platform on the BBC you most likely would, like I would or JK Rowling would- she's just more famous than the two of us put together I imagine so... she gets to spout her opinions on there and we get to do it on here x
neither is she. You're still not reading your own links, are you?
She is not, as Sky claim, leading the criticism; that's just their ranking. But her tweets are funnier than most. *That's* the way to influence people.
Clearly once you have made something of yourself in life you should learn to keep your gob shut. Only nameless, faceless, non-entities are entitled to an opinion.
Anyone who can't get behind the majority decision and help it be a success will have a voiced opinion of less value than those who do. If one has a platform, then use it for good, not to the detriment of one's nation. If one can not use it for good, resist using it at all.
But what if you think what's happening is not for the good of your nation ( as I do)? It's then your absolute moral duty to try to do something about that, and she is.