Jokes0 min ago
90 days?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by the>one. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1864974,00.htm l
The voting on the 90 days. Shows labour are still democratic. It would not have happened with a Tory government. they would vote with their leader no matter what what their consciences says. Do all the MPs know better than the chief constables and security forces. Lets hope we don't have to say "I told you so"
How can you compare the brainwashed German public of 60 odd years ago with the public of today. I hope you are not one of those patronising New Labour that think you know better then the rest of us.
On the 90 days you will never find a solution that is 100%. However personally I am with Mr Blair on this one and certainly very woried that the Tories and Libs may have used this as an excuse to battre Blair. Our National security should be beyond politics.
Also, I think your argument is too simplistic. Maybe incarcerating muslims for 90 days and then letting them go without charge will increase their hatred and make it more likely that innocent people will die.
This is a question of preference. You can't accuse the cats of being wrong about this.
80% of gmtv viewers think that 90 days' detention will make Britain a safer place.
This is not about preference, this is about right and wrong, cause and effect. Majorities count for nothing in this case (in terms of something being right or wrong.)
I don't think I know better than the rest of you, I'm just making a valid point, I think. If someone offers an argument which is wrong, and I point that out, then either accept it or explain why I'm wrong. Accusing me of being New Labour (which I'm not) doesn't support your case at all.
My understanding of the proposed amendment was that it was to be incorporated into British Law (at least that of England & Wales), and therefore applied to us all.
From your question's wording, the>one, you seem to be under the impression that it would only have applied to Muslims? Since you are obviously more informed about it, would you care to explain what part of the proposed amendment stated this?