OK, so the general theory is that the police let certain racial or religious groups get away with certain quite nasty crimes, like rape, for the purposes of social cohesion.
And this specific case, claiming somebody had a tanned skin, was yet another example of this happening.
It is a FACT that the police, politicians and social workers HAVE let certain racial or religious groups get away with certain quite nasty crimes, like rape.
Did you know bush blew up the world trade centre? Anyone who disagrees is either conditioned or an idiot or both IMO. I've said it so that's how it is.
ioronic it's the same police force but separate papers and the difference in story.. Maybe the papers are aiming for social cohesion and not the police??
Christian Asia Bibi has been refused a home in this country, the reason given that her presence would likely provoke social unrest; recently the European Court of Human Rights (to its eternal shame in my opinion) upheld an Austrian ruling on a trumped up blasphemy charge for the same reason; we’ve been told countless times that various Muslim terrorists are suffering from mental illness – and now we have a rapist who is clearly of foreign descent being described as ‘tanned’. What abject nonsense. How long the powers that be can continue to shove the ever-growing problem under the carpet remains to be seen, but whilst people continue to wallow in denial it will continue.
and the report never said he was tanned. They said he had a tanned complexion, complexion means 'natural colour'
Which, IMO, he does. Did you want them to say "he's also got a beard and we're gonna assume he's a Muslim, but he may not be, but lets assume he is" ??
// and the report never said he was tanned. They said he had a tanned complexion, complexion means 'natural colour' //
Tanned means something that started off a certain shade, but got darker. It's the wrong word to use in this context, unless of course they know that his complexion used to be lighter than it was before the time he committed the offence.