Is Labour Starting To Abolish Democracy...
News0 min ago
Liam Neeson
155 Answers
has he killed his own career?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by DeeLicious. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Tbh I've never seen it Retro, but I've just read it's plot and says nothing about indiscriminately targeting black men, say 'hunting down the gang'- but in any event that's fiction not real life. Nothing wrong with targeted revenge in a plot, just not sure anyone would really get behind a 'hero' wiping out a whole race just to make sure he got the right guy or to make his impotent self feel better.
That's exactly what I said in my first post when I said that society goes to great lengths to insulate white women from black men and it is a form of racism that's very hard to avoid because it's all around us socially and historically to portray black males as a threat. It's suited the agenda for centuries.
retro - // I am not struggling with anything except I can't recall how he knew and recognised all the gang members when he didn't witness the crime? //
The criteria for 1970's vigilantes in film to annihilate at will any person or persons deemed by appearance to be unreasonably depleting the planet's oxygen resources are clear and include, but are not limited to -
wearing unacceptably casual clothing, including inappropriate footwear, being trainers or biker boots etc.
wearing any kind of necklace or personal jewellery
wearing hair in any sort of challenging style and / or length
adopting an appropriately unconcerned attitude to the world in general, such as a sneer, a frown, or just generally looking at the vigilante in a funny way
talking in a foreign accent
being of foreign appearance
chewing gum
drinking in public, or in private
glancing for more than half-a-second at any female in the vicinity
being under twenty-five.
Hope this helps.
The criteria for 1970's vigilantes in film to annihilate at will any person or persons deemed by appearance to be unreasonably depleting the planet's oxygen resources are clear and include, but are not limited to -
wearing unacceptably casual clothing, including inappropriate footwear, being trainers or biker boots etc.
wearing any kind of necklace or personal jewellery
wearing hair in any sort of challenging style and / or length
adopting an appropriately unconcerned attitude to the world in general, such as a sneer, a frown, or just generally looking at the vigilante in a funny way
talking in a foreign accent
being of foreign appearance
chewing gum
drinking in public, or in private
glancing for more than half-a-second at any female in the vicinity
being under twenty-five.
Hope this helps.
That Neeson’s expression of regret for his past thoughts counts for nothing in the eyes of the new morality police is striking, and worrying. It points to a streak of very anti-human fatalism in the Twittermobbing phenomenon. The new witch-hunters are not in the business of forgiving people — even people who confess to their one-time horribleness — because they fundamentally believe that people cannot change. That if you once had a racist thought you will always be racist. That if you made a homophobic joke ten years ago, you will be a homophobe forever. This is why they engage in the low pursuit of ‘offence archaeology’, as the journalist Freddie de Boer described the trend for poring over public figures’ every past statement and deed in search of something nasty or embarrassing that might be used against said public figure today — because they think people do not change, that their wickedness is ingrained, that they suffer from original sin and it cannot be washed away.
