Twitching & Birdwatching4 mins ago
With The Ongoing Debacle That Is Brexit….
…has your attitude towards politics changed?
I’ve spoken to so many voters, both Labour and Conservative, who say that such is their disgust at the blatant disregard for the electorate and for the democratic process that they see no point in ever voting again.
What about you?
I’ve spoken to so many voters, both Labour and Conservative, who say that such is their disgust at the blatant disregard for the electorate and for the democratic process that they see no point in ever voting again.
What about you?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The vote was advisory the gov have no legal obligation to go with our vote but they do have a political obligation to uphold democracy. It was such a small % in favour also so i mean.. Was the vote democratically fair? With all the lies (from both sides) and the over spend on the campaigns I think a load of people were brainwashed, uneducated and had no clue of the consequences.
-- answer removed --
"The European Union Referendum Act 2015 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that made legal provision for a pre-legislative advisory referendum to be held in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Gibraltar, on whether it should remain a member state of the European Union or leave it."
I will vote again. But not for any Sitting MP that has gone out of their way to thwart Brexit and Not for any MP they parashute in that has gone out of their way to thwart Brexit. Or in fact for any party that did the same.
The trouble will be finding a candidate or party that didn’t. Especially in my area.
And pos
The trouble will be finding a candidate or party that didn’t. Especially in my area.
And pos
Spath, your raw facts are all well and good, but you are continuing to ignore the multitude of replies; that it stopped being advisory when parliament agreed it would be acted upon. It's legal status ceased to be the relevant part then. It was an agreement across the House to be obligatory (until one side felt democracy was only ok when it agreed with them).
It is to do with the subject Naomi. People emotional over their vote not being taken seriously and implemented, I'm saying there is no legal obligation for parliament to do so, and from the start, in 2015, it was known as an advisory vote.
So maybe your issue should be with the Tory party for not upholding a democratic decision, which is how your political view could change?
Regardless if they triggered Article 50 OG.. where are we now? We can still remain and the EU knows that. And if we did so, it would be perfectly legal.
My political view is the same. CrapAtCryptics sums it up perfectly.
So maybe your issue should be with the Tory party for not upholding a democratic decision, which is how your political view could change?
Regardless if they triggered Article 50 OG.. where are we now? We can still remain and the EU knows that. And if we did so, it would be perfectly legal.
My political view is the same. CrapAtCryptics sums it up perfectly.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.