CHILLDOUBT, you said, "the chances of a fair trial for an ex soldier in NI are decidedly minimal."
If you are suggesting a jury might be partial, there were Diplock courts for many years, trying cases without a jury in specific types of offences.
It is possible still to have trials without a jury and I think it likely there will be no jury in this case.
—————-
Do you seriously believe a former soldier will be tried in such a manner in the 21st century? I’m not saying it won’t but it’s highly unlikely IMHO.
This will rumble on and I daresay there wil be objections and appeals of all kinds on both sides. Given that the UK government will provide all means necessary for his defence I’m sure he’ll have the best QC’s available.
Maybe Soldier F will go down the ECHR route like so many terrorists families did when having their loved ones declared ‘unlawfully killed’ whilst attempting to commit unspeakable atrocities in the name of ‘freedom’.
Either way, after so many terrorists and murderers gaining freedom after the GFA I see no point in pursuing this some 47 years on, it just starts the arguments and re-ignites sectarianism all over again.
Once the GFA was ratified, everything prior should have become null and void. It certainly did for the terrorists.