Brecow Rules Out 3Rd Brexit Vote

[fiction-factory]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47614074
Not really a surprise, given his own views, and teh lengths some want to go to to prevent the vote happening again.

[ichkeria]

MPs might be able to vote that they want another vote :-)
Or of course she might be able to get the thing changed ... somehow.
Stephen Barclay was the one who stood up in Parliament last week closing the debate, urging MPs to vote for extending Article 50. And then promptly voted against it!
Cue yet more Monty Python music ...

[jim360]

"No Deal" is still very much on the table. MPs said that they didn't want it to happen but on its own that means nothing. As Naomi correctly says earlier, it remains the legal default. For this to change, either Parliament must move and pass emergency legislation to withdraw Article 50 Notification unilaterally, or Parliament must amend the specified Exit Date *and* get the EU to agree to an extension.

[dannyk13]

Sqad, the motion passed on 'no deal' is not binding. If there is no deal and no extension then on 29th March we will the EU.

[dannyk13]

^leave^

[Ellipsis]

Are the same words used in two different contexts the same question or two different questions?

[Sqad]

Danny,Jim....ah! I had forgotten that the vote on No Deal was not binding. Thanks.
But what about the Queen, as i mentioned?

[ichkeria]

We will end up staying in the customs union.
I think that would have the support of enough MPs in Parliament. That is a sensible outcome, much as many may shriek. We are too close to the Irish Republic not to take this approach. As has been painfully hammered home in the preceding message months.

[dannyk13]

Sqad with regard to the Queen she has already commentated on the tangled affair of the Brexit.Not sure what she can do officially.

[Sqad]

danny....yes.....quite so.

[ichkeria]

“No deal” will remain the legal default unless and until Article 50 is either revoked or a deal is signed. That No Deal cannot be actually “taken off the table” is self-evident.
However in the immediate time frame it has been effectively postponed. The only way we’d leave the EU on March 29, for starters, would be if the EU said we could not stay any longer. But that seems most unlikely. Any “No deal” exit I’m pretty sure would be preceded by some sort of formal “agreement to disagree” which might mitigate some of the worst effects. It’s a bit late now for that to be done by March 29.

[ichkeria]

It isn’t exactly the case that the vote to avoid No Deal isn’t binding”. That isn’t the point. It’s not binding in the sense that it doesn’t actually carry out what it wants, but that would very likely follow. A bit like a proposal of marriage rather then the actual wedding :-)