News1 min ago
Why Do They Keep Peacing Into The Wind With Indicative Votes?
29 Answers
How will that help? The EU would have to agree to anything and they ain't budging. So stop peace harrising about and leave with no deal.
Answers
By their own actions politicians have reduced this issue to a simple choice. The EU will never produce a deal that will command a majority in Parliament. It will either not meet the objectives of Brexit, will tie the UK to an arrangement from which it cannot withdraw or imposes intolerable conditions on the UK. (More probably all three of these and more). They...
23:00 Fri 29th Mar 2019
Several of the options are, ironically, based on the Withdrawal agreement. Certainly Ken Clarke’s is.
Also, we know now that the EU will agree to a longer extension.
So it is not quite as simple as that.
I think you need to accept that No Deal is dead. I suspect, myself, Brexit died this afternoon. What a day for it to happen.
Also, we know now that the EU will agree to a longer extension.
So it is not quite as simple as that.
I think you need to accept that No Deal is dead. I suspect, myself, Brexit died this afternoon. What a day for it to happen.
Lol parliament can’t really be said to be overruling the government. When the government had a plan that was maybe the case.But the plan is dead. In any case parliament is there to overrule the government should it think fit. Normally by voting it down rather than procedurally, but these are unusual times.
Yes No Deal is still on the table. A bit like a dish no one wants to eat any more. No one ordered it: it came compliments of the House, and it’s been sat there scaring the wits out of the diners who didn’t much like anything else on menu either.
But it seems the chef will in the end be taking it away.
But it seems the chef will in the end be taking it away.
If anybody ever has the inclination to enter 'gulliver' in the search box on AB, and then stretches that inclination further to actually read its posts, it quickly becomes obvious that it is a troll.
It genuinely believes that McDonnell would be good for our economy, Corbyn would be good for the country and Abbott would be good for our security.
Gulliver repeatedly shows itself up to be of weapons grade stupidity.
It is best ignored.
It genuinely believes that McDonnell would be good for our economy, Corbyn would be good for the country and Abbott would be good for our security.
Gulliver repeatedly shows itself up to be of weapons grade stupidity.
It is best ignored.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.