the fury is not justified. to me it smells like, they lsot the vote so they are angry and trying to find a loop hole to make another vote, or their result triumph?
Of course not.
Wherever you think of this woman she was in the Commons as of right and she didnt cast the “deciding vote” 313 MPs collectively did that.
It’s pretty shoddy journalism: the “fury” of the headline is more of the “look at this you should be furious” variety as I cannot see any furious reaction to it in the article. Plenty of other “furious reaction” admittedly
Having criminal tendencies does not disqualify you from becoming an MP. It appears in fact to be a positive asset to have. There you have it our democratic process condensed down to one fact. The Remainiacs defeat democracy by utilising the vote of one criminal.
//only about 7000 signatures required from valid constituents//
With the farcical behaviour generally of so many MP's,I just wonder whether enough constituents will bother to sign it.
It is becoming the norm for MP's to behave in contemptuous fashion so much so that any criminal behaviour is perhaps seen by many to be par for the course...
Bet she had a bit of a dash to get there as well......what with wearing an ankle bracelet and being at an "industrial tribunal" all day. Did she listen to the debate previously held?