Family Life6 mins ago
Can Bojo Get It This Time?
51 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-polit ics-482 99424
Personally I'd prefer Raab but I think Bojo will take some stopping. Anyway until Brexit is resolved there is no point in changing Treason.
Personally I'd prefer Raab but I think Bojo will take some stopping. Anyway until Brexit is resolved there is no point in changing Treason.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think BoJo's star has diminished lately (or at least he's loathed more than he's liked, even if he's liked the most). So maybe don't pencil him in as leader just yet. Also if it's left to the Conservative membership then maybe he does win, but as he has to get past the Parliamentary Party first that reduces his odds significantly.
even with the Tories in disarray, COB can't score in an open goal, so no danger of Jezza getting anywhere near No 10. Once Brexit is sorted Labour will dump him and his band of extremists in time to give the new leader a decent run at the 2022 election. Now next labour leader? that's a tough one, I feel a question coming on.....
Theresa May will surely resign if the Commons votes down her deal - again.
That will probably signal the end of one if the longest parliaments in British history and it’s inconceivable she’d be able to manage to pass a new Queen’s speech.
And then the fun starts :-)
I’d be careful what you wish for Brexit supporters. Mrs May going clears the way for a referendum or a general election or both.
A new parliament would have fewer Tory MPs I think it’s reasonable to assume.
That will probably signal the end of one if the longest parliaments in British history and it’s inconceivable she’d be able to manage to pass a new Queen’s speech.
And then the fun starts :-)
I’d be careful what you wish for Brexit supporters. Mrs May going clears the way for a referendum or a general election or both.
A new parliament would have fewer Tory MPs I think it’s reasonable to assume.
Well, it can go either way. But I suppose my point is that May's deal, up to some minor tweaks, is the only way that MPs can meaningfully claim to have left the EU without causing huge economic fallout. It's not unprecedented for a measure to be toxic as long as it's attached to a particular person, and then become suddenly palatable as soon as they are out of the picture. (Oh, and Boris voted for the Withdrawal Agreement in MV2.5, so he can pretend to be opposed to it all he likes -- when it comes to it he'd back it.)
Besides, the EU won't budge just because BoJo or anyone else is PM instead of May. Maybe once he, or someone else, takes over, they'll see things the same way May has been, rather than enjoy the privilege of shouting from the sidelines.
Besides, the EU won't budge just because BoJo or anyone else is PM instead of May. Maybe once he, or someone else, takes over, they'll see things the same way May has been, rather than enjoy the privilege of shouting from the sidelines.
//...my point is that May's deal, up to some minor tweaks, is the only way that MPs can meaningfully claim to have left the EU without causing huge economic fallout.//
They cannot make such a claim under Mrs May's deal, with or without minor tweaks. The deal is arguably worse than remaining because it ties the UK into a treaty which it cannot unilaterally rescind. Such an alternative treaty does not see the UK leave the EU in anything other than having its name crossed off the list of members. It does not even warrant being labelled a far cry from Mrs May's Lancaster House speech. The "huge economic fallout" is simply speculation and is never accompanied by (a) any similar fallout that will be visited on the EU27 or (b) the advantages that the UK will see from a clean break.
They cannot make such a claim under Mrs May's deal, with or without minor tweaks. The deal is arguably worse than remaining because it ties the UK into a treaty which it cannot unilaterally rescind. Such an alternative treaty does not see the UK leave the EU in anything other than having its name crossed off the list of members. It does not even warrant being labelled a far cry from Mrs May's Lancaster House speech. The "huge economic fallout" is simply speculation and is never accompanied by (a) any similar fallout that will be visited on the EU27 or (b) the advantages that the UK will see from a clean break.
I thought she should have gone long ago but tbh what is it about her in particular that is stopping Brexit.
Well she has a xxxx deal that no one likes but is there any chance a new pm could do anything differently now?
The EU will only give so many extensions and even if they ‘give’ a little on the deal to a new pm I don’t think it will be enough to change the deal in any appreciative or substantive way.
Therefore I think we will be in no different a position. But a new PM would make people feel better about ‘having got rid of that awful pm’.
Well she has a xxxx deal that no one likes but is there any chance a new pm could do anything differently now?
The EU will only give so many extensions and even if they ‘give’ a little on the deal to a new pm I don’t think it will be enough to change the deal in any appreciative or substantive way.
Therefore I think we will be in no different a position. But a new PM would make people feel better about ‘having got rid of that awful pm’.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.