MI5 ought not be above the law, but the law should allow that which is reasonable in order to protect the realm; and no more: for we don't need a future government (or other with access to the data) oppressing the people. The question is, how anyone is to manage that.
> A very minor negative affect from unlawful data holding . sharing what not is unwarranted or wanted cold calls, letters through the door, and general spam and scams.
Spath, to the elderly and vulnerable in particular, some of the effects you mention are extremely major rather than very minor.
Oh but to make such a statement which will obviously raise questions you must be able to answer it, No?
At least that is what you where telling me the other day when advising me to 'spit out' an answer to you!
It would have to come out of the security budget that is provided by the government that is used to stop security attacks.
So with less money less investigation will be done and more attacks will happen - but still if your happy with that - as long as your privacy is safe!
No, this isn't on me.. This is on MI5. If they need every penny for their operations, they shouldn't waste money by breaking laws and potentially being fined.
Cry troll all you want, you're just embarrassing yourself further.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.