MI5 ought not be above the law, but the law should allow that which is reasonable in order to protect the realm; and no more: for we don't need a future government (or other with access to the data) oppressing the people. The question is, how anyone is to manage that.
I assume the data they're talking about is that which is collected in order to pre-empt and foil terrorist activity, as such it has to relate to innocent people, because they've not committed a crime yet but are seen as possible risks.
Well, what can you do? We either accept that data gathering as a necessary evil and change the law or give up on that kind of preventative approach.
so you wouldn't mind daily bedroom checks from the police, if it meant we could maybe stop terrorism? You know.. because if you have nothing to hide, you have no reason to worry?
Sqad, you're right. And if there was smoke, then yes go put out that fire. However, in the case of MI5, the data they're collecting, has no smoke, or fire. It's simply timber waiting to be burned. Not even.. it's still a tree waiting to be turned into timber.
Like yours was a mature reply I suppose.
You really are beyond pointless trying to have a debate with! Your arguements are not thought out and are more based around a 12 year old thoughts.
You have read 1 article on the data gathering of MI5, I would imagine they gather useless data the same as HMRC does and every other government department.
//The law has been changed in the EU recently, under GDPR Legislation//
GDPR contains an exemption (section 2 Article 2) with respect to collection of data in pursuance of criminal matters. however actions under the investigatory powers act aren't always in that category.
in the matter of which law takes precedence, it will need a court case to set that.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.