Body & Soul0 min ago
Interesting Development
121 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Old_Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It brings the Queen squarely into the political debate, and into the Brexit controversy.
She has to acquiesce to Johnson’s demand, but suspending MPs from voting and is not how the game of parliament/monarchy is supposed to work.
The Queen will do it though, and the break up of the United Kingdom will result, which is certainly not what the Queen wants.
She has to acquiesce to Johnson’s demand, but suspending MPs from voting and is not how the game of parliament/monarchy is supposed to work.
The Queen will do it though, and the break up of the United Kingdom will result, which is certainly not what the Queen wants.
//the conferences could take place still but without the MPs. //
I've been to meetings like that, where attendance is compulsory and the "invitation" tells you it will be led by Mr CEO and other decision-making dignitaries..... only to find they've all cried off to attend an "urgent client session" leaving Mr nobody minion in charge who has no authority whatsoever and even less of a clue about the subject material. complete waste of time.
I've been to meetings like that, where attendance is compulsory and the "invitation" tells you it will be led by Mr CEO and other decision-making dignitaries..... only to find they've all cried off to attend an "urgent client session" leaving Mr nobody minion in charge who has no authority whatsoever and even less of a clue about the subject material. complete waste of time.
TTT,
Brexit at all cost has been your mantra. If it costs the break up the Union, you won’t be the slightest bit bothered, you have posted many times to that effect.
Break up is a serious possibility which is why political debate has/is been going on since 2016.
You may be right, and breakup might not happen, but as with so many of your brexit pronouncements, it is based on wishful thinking rather than any insight.
Brexit at all cost has been your mantra. If it costs the break up the Union, you won’t be the slightest bit bothered, you have posted many times to that effect.
Break up is a serious possibility which is why political debate has/is been going on since 2016.
You may be right, and breakup might not happen, but as with so many of your brexit pronouncements, it is based on wishful thinking rather than any insight.
Back benchers taking control of the order paper in an attempt to prevent the democratically arrived at decision of the people, is not how the 'game' of parliament/monarchy is supposed to work, either.
Any potential break up of the Union is something always threatened by mainly Scottish and Irish fanatics, Brexit or no Brexit. One has to assume more rational minds in the majority of the population will outvote them, and not be stopped from doing what is right by such threats. Capitulate to threats and one would never achieve anything.
Any potential break up of the Union is something always threatened by mainly Scottish and Irish fanatics, Brexit or no Brexit. One has to assume more rational minds in the majority of the population will outvote them, and not be stopped from doing what is right by such threats. Capitulate to threats and one would never achieve anything.