Motoring20 mins ago
Interesting Development
121 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Old_Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.How is he ? There's no, "of course", about it. Parliament is not delivering that which the public democratically demanded, so no longer have any right to claim a connection with democracy, only with their own desires. A strong leader, in support of democracy, tries to ensure they can't ruin delivery. An action in support of democracy, no action thrashing it; unlike many other MPs who now bellyache about it being made difficult to betray the public.
'' Parliament is not delivering that which the public democratically demanded, so no longer have any right to claim a connection with democracy, only with their own desires.''
Yep, and if the only way is to get the elected lot to shut up and honour the result, is to suspend, yep, go for it.
That way, on 1st November, we have left the EU and businesses can stop whinging about uncertainty.
Yep, and if the only way is to get the elected lot to shut up and honour the result, is to suspend, yep, go for it.
That way, on 1st November, we have left the EU and businesses can stop whinging about uncertainty.
The same old arguments recurring again and again from those who know all about ‘trashing democracy’. The fact is had parliament delivered on the result of the democratic referendum, as it should have done, the country would have been spared three years of lip-dragging, lies, and wrangling. It has to stop.
Remainers don't want this to drag on any more than you do. They have a radically different idea of how to end it, of course, but a situation where it drags on and on is also stupid. The problem comes because in a country that remains deeply split no compromise is possible: Brexit supporters want their prize *now*, at any cost; Remain supporters want to deny them any form of their prize.
You find a way out of this mess. But if either side wins the other will be justifiably furious, and it will still not end.
You find a way out of this mess. But if either side wins the other will be justifiably furious, and it will still not end.
//Boris and " His Final Solution " Be careful what you wish for , it could easily Backfire//
I don't normally respond to your nonsense, gulliver, but this time I can't resist. There is nothing unusual in suspending or "proroguing" Parliament. It usually happens once a year in October. It is suspended until a new Queen's Speech is presented in early November and all bills and other business that is not completed is effectively abandoned. What's unusual with this Parliamentary session is that it has lasted more than 26 months, since June 2017 and it is long overdue for termination. Mr Johnson has taken the opportunity to end the session so as to present his new programme to the House. He has a duty to deliver Brexit and cannot do so whilst continually obstructed by recalcitrant MPs who have no intention of doing so.
Talk of "brown shirts" and Hitler are utter nonsense. It is precisely because Parliament has shown itself unable to properly govern the country in the interests of the electorate that it has become necessary and in fact the House would have closed for three weeks anyway for their Jolly Boys' Outings (aka "conferences").
I don't normally respond to your nonsense, gulliver, but this time I can't resist. There is nothing unusual in suspending or "proroguing" Parliament. It usually happens once a year in October. It is suspended until a new Queen's Speech is presented in early November and all bills and other business that is not completed is effectively abandoned. What's unusual with this Parliamentary session is that it has lasted more than 26 months, since June 2017 and it is long overdue for termination. Mr Johnson has taken the opportunity to end the session so as to present his new programme to the House. He has a duty to deliver Brexit and cannot do so whilst continually obstructed by recalcitrant MPs who have no intention of doing so.
Talk of "brown shirts" and Hitler are utter nonsense. It is precisely because Parliament has shown itself unable to properly govern the country in the interests of the electorate that it has become necessary and in fact the House would have closed for three weeks anyway for their Jolly Boys' Outings (aka "conferences").
//The problem comes because the losers refuse to acknowledge that they lost. They lost. No compromise required.//
Indeed. I have asked constantly in the last couple of years why any compromise is necessary. I ask because it has never been explained how much "compromise" would have ensued had the vote been 52:48 to Remain.
Indeed. I have asked constantly in the last couple of years why any compromise is necessary. I ask because it has never been explained how much "compromise" would have ensued had the vote been 52:48 to Remain.