Quizzes & Puzzles9 mins ago
Now What ? Or Now What A Mess
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Updated thread here:-
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/New s/Quest ion1672 750.htm l#answe r-12100 833
https:/
It's a mess of the Remainers' making:
1. Parliament agreed (by eleven to one) to hold a referendum.
2. The electorate voted to leave the EU.
3. Parliament Ratified their decision by invoking A50
(Note: none of the above had a "deal" as a proviso for our departure)
4. A general election was held and 80% of MPs elected were voted in on a manifesto of leaving the EU.
5. The EU (predictably) offered a totally unsatisfactory deal, adding (repeatedly) that it was not negotiable.
6. That deal was rejected three times by Parliament.
7. Remainers began to assert that leaving with No Deal had no democratic mandate. How they arrived at that conclusion is puzzling because there is no democratic mandate to leave with one either.
8. Remainers have continually used devious Parliamentary procedures to delay and deny Brexit. They say it is the manner of leaving which irks them but have rejected the only deal on offer whereas it is the fact that we are leaving at all that upsets them.
9. Mr Johnson has said he will deliver Brexit by whatever means is necessary. The continued delay and denial must end as it is causing the country considerable harm.
1. Parliament agreed (by eleven to one) to hold a referendum.
2. The electorate voted to leave the EU.
3. Parliament Ratified their decision by invoking A50
(Note: none of the above had a "deal" as a proviso for our departure)
4. A general election was held and 80% of MPs elected were voted in on a manifesto of leaving the EU.
5. The EU (predictably) offered a totally unsatisfactory deal, adding (repeatedly) that it was not negotiable.
6. That deal was rejected three times by Parliament.
7. Remainers began to assert that leaving with No Deal had no democratic mandate. How they arrived at that conclusion is puzzling because there is no democratic mandate to leave with one either.
8. Remainers have continually used devious Parliamentary procedures to delay and deny Brexit. They say it is the manner of leaving which irks them but have rejected the only deal on offer whereas it is the fact that we are leaving at all that upsets them.
9. Mr Johnson has said he will deliver Brexit by whatever means is necessary. The continued delay and denial must end as it is causing the country considerable harm.
Baldric is correct .No apologies needed. I came in after you Bobbisox.
//Now What ?//
Lol. The mess will be the cataclysmic flood of tears from the sulking remainers who were thwarted twice in their cowardly anti-democratic cabals.
Appears Her Majesty has no time for traitors and back stabbers. Grieve must be thanking his stars the Treason act was amended.
//Now What ?//
Lol. The mess will be the cataclysmic flood of tears from the sulking remainers who were thwarted twice in their cowardly anti-democratic cabals.
Appears Her Majesty has no time for traitors and back stabbers. Grieve must be thanking his stars the Treason act was amended.
NJ.....well posted.
Now at last....we see 2 major flaws in the political system.
1) Parliamentary procedures are too complex and need revising.
2) In this particular instance, democracy has failed and has been seen to feel.
I support the stance by Johnson, who has basically stated that he is taking on the EU and Parliamentarians in an effort to end this Brexit farce.
I am a remainer and also no fan of Johnson
Now at last....we see 2 major flaws in the political system.
1) Parliamentary procedures are too complex and need revising.
2) In this particular instance, democracy has failed and has been seen to feel.
I support the stance by Johnson, who has basically stated that he is taking on the EU and Parliamentarians in an effort to end this Brexit farce.
I am a remainer and also no fan of Johnson