Motoring10 mins ago
Prorogation Ruled To Be Unlawful
383 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by THECORBYLOON. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.ANNE, Lady Hale said, "This Court has already concluded that the Prime Minister's advice to Her Majesty was unlawful, void and of no effect. This means that the Order in Council to which it led was also unlawful, void and of no effect and should be quashed. This means that when the Royal Commissioners walked into the House of Lords it was as if they walked in with A BLANK SHEET OF PAPER. (my emphasis)
The prorogation was also void and of no effect. Parliament has not been prorogued. This is the unanimous judgment of all 11 Justices."
The prorogation was also void and of no effect. Parliament has not been prorogued. This is the unanimous judgment of all 11 Justices."
As someone with a first-class degree in law I'd have thought you'd be the first person to argue that the sensible thing to do is to read the judgement, JD. The judges make clear that, for the purposes of prorogation, the Queen was bound to follow the advice, and so it is the *advice* that is being ruled unlawful. Therefore the action, which is not a proceeding in Parliament, is also unlawful. I'd assume you were also aware of the 1611 Case of Proclamations, which states that "the King hath no power but that which is granted to him by the law of the land". It stands to reason, therefore, that the Queen can't do anything that is contrary to the law of the land either -- and it is up the Courts to determine that.
//Boris has broken the law, not HRH.//
Think again. Boris took advice from The Attorney General who gave legal support for a prorogation of Parliament. The UK Supreme Court(another Bliar piece of work) has declared it unlawful. Will the Attorney General now face prosecution? Or has the S.C. just implemented a new law of its own without it going through the Parliamentary process?
The people are no longer sovereign,a rotten parliament, corrupt foreign businessmen, corrupt lawyers, a corrupt UK Supreme Court and corrupt quangos, such as the Electoral Commission are sovereign. Vote in a referendum for the UK to exit the EUSSR .....ignored. Vote for a politician in the UK .. they change parties to avoid accountability. Demand a G.E...... the politicians "vote" no to thwart our intent to oust the liars....The real irony is that the UK government has no right to appeal this political sleight of hand from the SC..........except to the European Court Of Justice. A vomit inducing oxymoron that will eventually shake this establishment off its lofty perch.
Think again. Boris took advice from The Attorney General who gave legal support for a prorogation of Parliament. The UK Supreme Court(another Bliar piece of work) has declared it unlawful. Will the Attorney General now face prosecution? Or has the S.C. just implemented a new law of its own without it going through the Parliamentary process?
The people are no longer sovereign,a rotten parliament, corrupt foreign businessmen, corrupt lawyers, a corrupt UK Supreme Court and corrupt quangos, such as the Electoral Commission are sovereign. Vote in a referendum for the UK to exit the EUSSR .....ignored. Vote for a politician in the UK .. they change parties to avoid accountability. Demand a G.E...... the politicians "vote" no to thwart our intent to oust the liars....The real irony is that the UK government has no right to appeal this political sleight of hand from the SC..........except to the European Court Of Justice. A vomit inducing oxymoron that will eventually shake this establishment off its lofty perch.
'It’s of course a significant blow but let’s be clear – Mr Johnson won’t be resigning any time soon and whilst he maintains the support of party members, the Parliamentary Conservative party and the Cabinet, he remains the Prime Minister and leads an administration committed to leaving the European Union on October 31.
In that sense, the fundamentals haven’t changed. The Brexit mandate is bigger than even the decision of the highest court in the land.
Furthermore, believe it or not, his plan remains intact. With the possible tweak of a further prorogation to allow for the holding of the Conservative Party conference in Manchester next week, which even the Supreme Court would surely not consider to be “extreme”, a Queen's Speech the following week and a Budget thereafter, this legal imbroglio has essentially been centred on an extra week in which Parliament will now sit.'
Telegraph (premium)
In that sense, the fundamentals haven’t changed. The Brexit mandate is bigger than even the decision of the highest court in the land.
Furthermore, believe it or not, his plan remains intact. With the possible tweak of a further prorogation to allow for the holding of the Conservative Party conference in Manchester next week, which even the Supreme Court would surely not consider to be “extreme”, a Queen's Speech the following week and a Budget thereafter, this legal imbroglio has essentially been centred on an extra week in which Parliament will now sit.'
Telegraph (premium)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.