//I can't see how anyone believes that bringing up children is ever the easier or lazier option!// I don't believe anybody is suggesting it is the "easier option". Such people will churn out kids whatever their circumstances. They are unlikely to be able (or willing) to earn enough to keep them so benefits is a suitable choice. Unlike working people, more...
I'm sure it varies family to family, people are always told to prioritise the roof over their head, then there's food and utilities. Children grown out of shoes so quickly and cheap isn't always best.
Of course some are better at budgeting than others too.
When I was on benefits, for some reason, the Child Benefit was paid a day later than my Income Support. That was a very welcome tenner. I certainly couldn’t afford to put it away to save up for shoes.
I didn’t have a massive telly either.
Will that cliche ever stop being trotted out?
//How far do you think £20 for the eldest and £13 for subsequent children goes?//
Far enough to ensure they are properly shod. It's not supposed to provide for their every need. That their parents' job. Quite why the government finds it necessary to shell out this money at all is quite beyond me.
when i was a child i had handme downs, that included underwear socks
etc..our mum made stews and other meals you could have two days in a row with a little tweaking, she would get a soup bone from the butchers boil it, we had broth and bread, chicken carcass also boiled
nothing wasted, b/w telly and a radiogram.. we thought we were doing rather well..i do remember using an old pair of socks for gloes in winter...but we were happy.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.